This frequently happens. Loss of habitat leads to loss of food sources and shelter. Often, when new non-native species are introduced, it is usually the introduced species that thrives and the native species that becomes extinct. Ultimately, what happens is that yet another species gets marked down as extinct, but nothing is done to address the problem. .. On the other hand, would a species "get marked down" if no observation of it is made? would another species benefit from the extintion? would a species that benefits from the the more plentiful food source consider it "a problem"? would another species suffer a change of diet? is there a species that relied on the feces of the extinct species, or the breath of the species, or some intestinal function, or needed the food source to be kept in check that the extinct species was competing for? would another species be able to use the winning species as a food source, or symbiont, or ...
Extinction
The human race would not be far from extinction.
leads to goitre
If friction is more it leads to unwanted things
The oysters would die and cockles (which they feed on) would increase.
If things go on,ozone will be soon finished. This will cause life extinction.
the answer to the question is extinction
supposedly nothing.
photosynthesis would stop,temperature will drop to zero,ocean surfaces would freeze,extinction human etc
It would eventually lead to extinction. The reason being ozone is a protector for us in the atmosphere.
the earth will contaminate more than it is now that would provoke the extinction of lots of organisms
I does not. The asteroid would of had to knock out the entire earth for that to happen. If you think of the facts it is just not possible.