the koala eats toxic leaves and it it adapted to eating them so the toxins don't effect it, so if it didn't addapt to it, the koala would probably eat something else
None at all. The koala is not a bear; nor does it live in Africa; nor can it survive in grasslands.See the related question for what adaptations a koala has.
they have there own community
The Koala has many adaptations. The Koala has fur that is water repellant and protects them fom hot and cold weather. Koalas have a large nose to determine if the eucalypts leaves that they are about to eat are poisonous or not. Also, the koalas paws are thickly padded, allowing for a better grip as the koalas climb.
The Koala has many adaptations. The Koala has fur that is water repellant and protects them fom hot and cold weather. Koalas have a large nose to determine if the eucalypts leaves that they are about to eat are poisonous or not. Also, the koalas paws are thickly padded, allowing for a better grip as the koalas climb.
Koalas are not bears, so there is no such animal as a "koala bear".And no, there are no dwarf koalas. There is just one species of koala, and it is Phascolarctus cinereus.
yes
they do itb internally not externelly
It wouldn't be able to reproduce.
Koalas do exist. Koala bears don't. Someone has picked up this term but it is incorrect. Koalas are definitely not bears, but marsupials unique to Australia.
The koala can sometimes establish its new territory, but most often it will find itself in territorial disputes with other koalas. Many times, it will try to return to its former territory, and koala relocations are rarely successful.
No. There is no king koala, and koalas are not bears. There is no such creature as a "koala bear". It is just "koala".
A koala scat simply refers to the droppings of a koala.