Want this question answered?
They did not have enough money to pay for supplies from the company store.
They did not have enough money to pay for supplies from the company store.
probably not. infact, dont hold your breath on a successful revolution happening in your lifetime.
Leading up to the Civil War the southern states could accurately be described as federalist.
This could go either way: I HOPE not.
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
they could rent more land, find another landowner to sharecrop for, and look for work in town
Sharecroppers could have planted:CottonRiceCorn
they had to stay on the land until they could pay
they had to stay on the land until they could pay
Sharecroppers who did not make enough money to pay their expenses would often fall into debt to the landowner or merchant. They could end up trapped in a cycle of debt and poverty, unable to break free or own their own land. In some cases, they might be forced to leave the land and seek work elsewhere.
Sharecropping in the South during ReconstructionSharecropping involved renting land and sometimes implements from a landowner, so that a farmer could raise crops. This was not as efficient a system as large slave plantations, but was preferred by many blacks over a return to hired servitude. Unemployed whites also participated in the system.Sharecroppers were charged high interest rates and had to give a portion of their crops to the landowners. This meant that most sharecroppers lived in poverty with little chance to own land or homes of their own.
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.