if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
It would not be soil anymore it would be some minerals.
P.S. Can't believe i got to answer my Q haha lol rotfl.
WOAH! i cant believe all the question's ive asked are EXACTLY from my 6th grade science text book!
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
there would only be minerals left, if all decomposers were removed they would not be able to form humus there for the soil would be low in fertility.
When vegetation is removed from the land, it would cause a lot of erosion, soil fertility and many more possibilities that would endanger the lives of living things.
Nothing. There is a misconception that there is an energetic cycle in an ecosystems but that is erroneous. There is a cycle in nitrogen and other nutrients that decomposers engender and, eventually, plants absorb but there is zero energy content in those as plants take 100 of the energy from the sun. The purport of decomposers is to return nutrients to the soil, not energy. Energy only flows in one direction in the biological world starting and getting dispersed out by the different biological organisms until is thoroughly lost to the entropy in the universe. A decomposer is yet another organism that consumes the energy amassed by the plants from the sun and disperses it out.
Nothing would happen.
I would not think that it does because silt is a mixture of clay and rock . Wich would not make the soil fertile .
denitrification is soil bacteria converting nitrates into nitrogen gas, is process releases nitrogen into the atmosphere. If there wasn't any bacteria, there would be no process and therefor the nitrogen wouldn't make it into the atmosphere.
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
plant growth would be affected.
It would be a mineral it would no longer be soil!!lol ha ha i got to ansower this
It would be a mineral it would no longer be soil!!lol ha ha i got to ansower this
It wouldn't be soil any more, it would just be some minerals... And i think you meant decomposer's not decomposes..
It wouldn't be soil any more, it would just be some minerals... And i think you meant decomposer's not decomposes..
Things would break down extremely slowly (mostly from ultraviolet and abrasion), much like what happens today with most plastic.
If there were too many decomposers in the world, the decomposers would begin to die. Too many or too few decomposers would harm the food chain.
In the absence of decomposers from carbon cycle heaps of organic matter will accumulate. This will ultimately disturb the natural balance.
If there was no decomposers in an ecosystem then all the remains and waste of animals and plants would be lying around for there would be no decompostiton of that waste. Also, if there was no decomposers then none of that natural nutrients can be returned back to the ecosystem.