if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
The fertility of the soil would decrease because decomposers play a vital role in breaking down organic matter into nutrients that plants can use. Without decomposers, the organic matter would not be broken down efficiently, leading to a decrease in nutrient availability for plants. This can result in reduced plant growth and productivity.
If nothing decomposed, life as we know it would end. When something dies, bugs, worms, and microscopic organisms break it down. They leave nutrients in the soil for plants to absorb. So without decomposition, all plants would die off, due to lack of nutrients in the soil. If all plants died, it would take very little time for a majority of life on earth to die off.
Without soil, most plants would not be able to grow as they rely on soil for nutrients, water, and support. This would disrupt ecosystems, leading to a breakdown in food chains and the loss of habitats for many organisms. Soil erosion would also increase, affecting the fertility of land and leading to environmental degradation.
Nothing. There is a misconception that there is an energetic cycle in an ecosystems but that is erroneous. There is a cycle in nitrogen and other nutrients that decomposers engender and, eventually, plants absorb but there is zero energy content in those as plants take 100 of the energy from the sun. The purport of decomposers is to return nutrients to the soil, not energy. Energy only flows in one direction in the biological world starting and getting dispersed out by the different biological organisms until is thoroughly lost to the entropy in the universe. A decomposer is yet another organism that consumes the energy amassed by the plants from the sun and disperses it out.
Removing vegetation from the land can lead to soil erosion, decreased water retention, loss of biodiversity, and disruption of ecosystems. It can also contribute to increased air pollution and climate change as vegetation plays a vital role in absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen.
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
plant growth would be affected.
It would be a mineral it would no longer be soil!!lol ha ha i got to ansower this
It would be a mineral it would no longer be soil!!lol ha ha i got to ansower this
The fertility of the soil would decrease because decomposers play a vital role in breaking down organic matter into nutrients that plants can use. Without decomposers, the organic matter would not be broken down efficiently, leading to a decrease in nutrient availability for plants. This can result in reduced plant growth and productivity.
It wouldn't be soil any more, it would just be some minerals... And i think you meant decomposer's not decomposes..
It wouldn't be soil any more, it would just be some minerals... And i think you meant decomposer's not decomposes..
In the absence of decomposers from carbon cycle heaps of organic matter will accumulate. This will ultimately disturb the natural balance.
If the producers were removed then there would be no beginning to the food chain and the complete ecosystem would die off. If the detrivores and decomposers were removed there would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals habitat.The ecosystem will be fill by plants and animal wastes as there will be no decompositon of waste material. .
If there was no decomposers in an ecosystem then all the remains and waste of animals and plants would be lying around for there would be no decompostiton of that waste. Also, if there was no decomposers then none of that natural nutrients can be returned back to the ecosystem.