It wouldn't be soil any more, it would just be some minerals... And i think you meant decomposer's not decomposes..
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
plant growth would be affected.
It would be a mineral it would no longer be soil!!lol ha ha i got to ansower this
It would be a mineral it would no longer be soil!!lol ha ha i got to ansower this
It wouldn't be soil any more, it would just be some minerals... And i think you meant decomposer's not decomposes..
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
The fertility of the soil would decrease because decomposers play a vital role in breaking down organic matter into nutrients that plants can use. Without decomposers, the organic matter would not be broken down efficiently, leading to a decrease in nutrient availability for plants. This can result in reduced plant growth and productivity.
If all the decomposers in an ecosystem were destroyed then the ecosystem would all apart. This is because they give the nutrients back to the soil in order for new organisms to grow.
the seed would wither and die
If all decomposers were removed from a temperate forest ecosystem, organic matter such as dead plants, animals, and waste would accumulate, leading to a buildup of detritus. Nutrient cycling would be severely disrupted, as decomposers play a crucial role in breaking down organic material and recycling nutrients back into the soil. This would ultimately hinder plant growth, reduce soil fertility, and impact the entire food web, as producers and consumers would struggle to thrive without the essential nutrients provided by decomposition. Over time, this could lead to a decline in biodiversity and the overall health of the ecosystem.