If seed shape did not have a clearly dominant form
If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form
if seed color and shape were located on the same chromosome
if seed color and shape were located on the same chromosome
If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form
A potential factor that might have stopped Mendel from finding a pattern in his results would be if seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form. This ambiguity would have made it difficult for him to observe consistent inheritance patterns, as the traits would not segregate in a predictable manner. The clarity of dominant and recessive traits was crucial for Mendel's conclusions about inheritance.
If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form
um well, me, you or someone else that smart enough and DOES happen to build a WORKING TIME MACHINE, goes back in time and blows his brains out (aka you shoot him in the head).
The most likely result would be complete paralysis followed by death due to lack of breathing.
If Mendel had not controlled for factors such as environmental conditions or genetic variations within his pea plants, he would have been less likely to find a pattern in his results. Additionally, if he had a small sample size or limited data, this could have also prevented him from detecting patterns in his experiments.
you most likely have warped brake rotors
A. If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form, Mendel might have struggled to discern a pattern in his results. The existence of distinct dominant and recessive traits allowed him to observe consistent ratios in offspring, which were crucial for formulating his laws of inheritance. Without clear recessive traits, the patterns he identified in his experiments would likely have been obscured, hindering his ability to develop his foundational principles of genetics.
if both stopped working at the exact same time it is most likely a fuse... consult your owners manual for fuse location and specification