If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form
if seed color and shape were located on the same chromosome
If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form
Not using a large enough sample size could stop Mendel from finding a pattern in his results. Also, if he failed to control for variables that could influence the outcome, this might also hinder his ability to identify a pattern. Additionally, if his data was inaccurate or if there were errors in recording the results, this could prevent a clear pattern from emerging.
If seed shape did not have a clearly recessive form
if seed color and shape were located on the same chromosome
um well, me, you or someone else that smart enough and DOES happen to build a WORKING TIME MACHINE, goes back in time and blows his brains out (aka you shoot him in the head).
If seed shape did not have a clearly dominant form. If seed color and shape were located on the same chromosome
If Mendel had not controlled for factors such as environmental conditions or genetic variations within his pea plants, he would have been less likely to find a pattern in his results. Additionally, if he had a small sample size or limited data, this could have also prevented him from detecting patterns in his experiments.
If Medle had not collected enough data to conduct a meaningful analysis or if the data was incomplete or inaccurate, he would most likely not be able to find a pattern in his results. Additionally, if there was too much variability or noise in the data, it would also make it difficult for Medle to identify a clear pattern.
because it helped Mendel discover which plants would be crossed to produce offspring.
If seed shape did not have a clearly dominant form
if the f14 pea plants had traits of neither parent Mendel might not have concluded that factors for traits are passed from one generation to the next