This must be reffering to that assignment regarding Brutus and Caesar....
If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.
The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.The last king was drive out and the republic was formed.
Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.Mauritius is a republic, so it does not have a king or queen.
Russia is a republic, so it has a president, not a king. It did have a Tsar, similar to a King, up to 1917.
It meant that instead of a king, the country had a president.
The Republic of Guinea has no king or any royal family. It is a presidential republic.
There is not Loyal King or Queen in the Dominican Republic.
We have no king. We are a republic.
You mean Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, who is married to President Sarkozy (not the King of France, since France is a republic, not a monarchy!).
There is no king. It is republic, not monarchy
Cameroon is a republic. It does not have a king.
There was none. The Romans hated even the word king and would never tolerate one. However after the fall of the Roman republic Octavian/Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. We call him an emperor, not a king.