0
Answer 1:
It probably would not be very different than it is now. Major historical events like that do not really alter the course of history, they just accelerate or decelerate it. At the time of the court case, there were major racial conflicts in the country that would have came to a boil and required changes to be made regardless of how the Supreme Court ruled. A good case can be made that the decision's prohibition of segregation in schools had major effects on the speed at which the racist laws and attitudes at the time were changed. It and other Supreme Court decisions prohibiting racist practices may have even pushed the civil rights campaign ahead as much as a decade faster than it would have otherwise. But regardless what would have happened with these cases, we would eventually have had essentually the same alterations of history has occured. There were numerous sociatal factors that caused a push towards integration and reduced discrimination and racism. The outcome of a few court decisions a half century ago were not going to determine what type of society we live in today.
Answer 2:
There is some truth to historical trends. However, in this case, the Supreme Court got it right. Even after their ruling, note that it took awhile. I could easily see some states being "separate but equal" now, if they had not ruled as they did.
And I doubt we'd have a black President. Not without all the voters having had an opportunity growing up to see that black kids and white kids could be together, and that both were as smart.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the significance of the us supreme court decision in Brown vs Board of Education?
Brown vs Board of Education was huge for African Americans and the nation as a whole. It changed how integrated the schools would become and what rights were allowed to African Americans.
How did the Jim crow laws affect blacks education?
Brown vs Board of Education case (you can look it up in wikipedia) desegregated public schools, so black and whites would be together. Brown vs Board of Education, Topeka KS was a civil rights movement.
What was the unanimous ruling in Brown v Board of Education?
The unanimous holding in Brown v. Board was that "separate but equal", the policy by which Blacks and Whites in segregation would be separated but would receive equal treatment could not function. Separate was inherently unequal. The result was that all of the laws and systems of segregation, especially in education, were illegal or likely to be deemed illegal.
What did the Supreme court do in the ruling known as Brown II?
The Supreme Court ruling known as Brown II helped outlaw segregation in schools. It was also known as Brown V. Board of Education. The law didn't specify when or how the schools would desegregate, but that they would.
What was the ruling in the Brown vs the board of Education case?
It was that all blacks had a chance to sit down in class and be equal like their white peers. This was crucial in making sure that they would have the same quality of education as everyone else. Since then, the ruling has ensured the equal rights to an education for blacks.
Why would segregationists want to impeach earl warren?
segregation disagreed with brown v. board of education........apex :)
How would the fourteenth amendment relate to brown v. board of education?
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)The United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, (1954), was based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Although the Due Process Cause was probably also applicable, Chief Justice Earl Warren explained it was unnecessary for the Court to review the case in terms of both clauses, because the Equal Protection Clause was sufficient to declare segregation in public school unconstitutional.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Did the US Supreme Court order racially segregated public schools to integrate in Brown v. Board of Education II?
Brown v. Board of Education II, 349 US 294 (1955)AnswerYes. The Court declared segregation unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education, 374 US 483 (1954), and ordered integration, overseen by the US District Courts, in Brown v. Board of Education (II), 349 US 294 (1955).ExplanationThe US Supreme Court first declared segregation in public education unconstitutional in 1954, in the consolidated cases heard under the caption Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954). This overturned the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson,(1896), that allowed "separate but equal" accommodations for African-Americans in most areas of life, including education. In Brown, the Supreme Court determined that "separated but equal" wasn't equal, and unfairly branded African-American students as inferior.The Court recognized, however, that the logistics of integration would be difficult in many school districts, so they set a future date to determine the practical aspects of their earlier ruling. In Brown v. Board of Education (II), 349 US 294 (1955), commonly known as Brown II, the Court ordered the US District Courts to oversee application of the mandate requiring public schools to integrate with "all deliberate speed."Although most people consider 1954 the year the Court ordered integration, the mandate wasn't handed down until 1955, in the separate, but related, Brown IIcase.
How do you write a letter to board of education about school?
It is very easy to write a letter to the Board of Education about a school. Open the letter with the fact you would like to make and then follow up with substantiating information about the fact. Usually the Board of Education enjoys receiving feedback from citizens.
Why did Chief Justice Warren make an anonymous decision in the case Brown v Board of Education?
Chief Justice Warren didn't make an anonymous (meaning without revealing names) decision, the Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision (meaning they all agreed) in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).The justices wanted to take a strong, united stance against segregation by issuing a single opinion signed by everyone. This sent a clear message to those who resisted desegregation that "separate but equal" was "inherently unequal" and would no longer be sanctioned by the Supreme Court.The decision also opened the door to challenges of Jim Crow laws, and other discriminatory practices, with the expectation the Court would dismantle the institution of racism (or at least try).Case Citation:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
When did separate but equal end?
The "separate but equal" doctrine would characterize American society until the doctrine was ultimately overturned during the 1954 Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
What would happen to the grass underneath the board?
what would happen to the grass underneath the board would be that the grass would shrivel up or turn brown because of the sunlight being blocked by the board. there would be less water and that would cause death or dehigration to the grass underneath.
