answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

By if the feeding was slim.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would limit the number of trophic levels?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What trophic levels would cars be in?

The One We are in right now.


How would an ecosystem with a greater number of individual herbivores than individual producers affect the shape of the ecosystem's pyramid of numbers?

It expresses biomass at different trophic levels in an ecosystem.


What are the levels of trophic level?

i think it would be producer, then primary consumer, then secondary consumer, then tertiary consumer.


Does a cheetah belong in a trophic level?

i hope you mean trophic levels because then my answer will be correct. and yes it would be in the top level because producers go at the bottom and since a cheetah is a top consumer (nothing else eats it) it would go at the top.


Describe a meal in which a person would be feeding at two or more trophic levels and identify the levels?

If a person were eating meat and vegetables, he/she would be feeding as a first order consumer (vegetables) and a second order consumer (meat).


What do you think would happen to consumers if they a re less plant growth?

A decrease in consumers, naturally, all the way up the trophic levels.


Why is the number of trophic level that can exist limited?

All sources of energy come from the sun. Autotrophs make their own energy through photosynthesis by collecting energy from the sun. When an organism (herbivore) at the next trophic level eats them they only get approximately 10% of the energy that the first organism had. When another organism eats the animal that ate the plate they only get approximately 10% of the energy of what that animal got from the previous animal. So this animal only got 1% of the energy from the sun. If more trophic levels existed they would only get 10% of this 1% so would not get enough energy (approximately 0.1%) so is why trophic levels are limited.


Why are there always fewer tertiary consumers than producers in an ecosystem?

Only 10% of energy is moved from one trophic level to another in the biomass consumed. So, at the tertiary level there is only enough food energy to support a limited number of consumers. As the number of trophic levels increases, you also have to be more adapted so you can become a predator of the trophic levels below you. If for example there was a species that were above humans, they would have to be smarter, quicker and more adapted - which gets progressively harder.


Why do biologists measure the number of trophies levels in an ecosystem measure the number of trophic levels in an ecosystem?

To check its stability and health


If decomposers were added to an energy pyramid that contains producers primary consumers and secondary consumers which trophic level or levels would be affected?

all consumers


What is trophic mass?

I would assume it to be the amount of mass in a specific trophic level. Thus, the trophic mass pyramid.


Does the population size increase or decrease at higher trophic levels in the pyramid of numbers of an ecosystem consisting of a tree insects (that are herbivores) and birds feeding on the insects?

Population sizes decrease at higher trophic levels. If they increased the insects population would decrease meaning there would be less food available for the birds so their population size would then decrease. Look at the relationships between predator and prey species for more information