Humans are produced via sexual reproduction. That gives genetic diversity. You do not get such genetic diversity in case of the parthenogenesis. It is poor mode of reproduction.
As a mammal, a deer would be reproduced internally.
The fruit tree can be asexually reproduced through grafting, budding or sprouting, but the fruit itself would not exist if the tree had not reproduced sexually. The seed within the fruit is the proof of sexual reproduction.
it would not occur at all
A tornado would occur in the troposphere, the layer closest to the Earth.
Yes, because mating with yourself is a kind of incest. That wouldn't be cloning (/parthenogenesis), as the animal has no mechanism for this. Combining your own sperm and eggs combines defect genes, like incest would. ^^
Lets say there are 20 prokaryotes and they don't reproduce. They would die one by one until you had no prokaryotes. If they had reproduced, you would have more than 20 prokaryotes. So what I'm trying to say is that prokaryotes reproduce to keep their race alive. If humans didnt reproduce, in a while there would be no humans at all. It's the same with prokaryotes. Hope this helped.
Most definitly. Asexually reproduced plants are clones of each others so have no genetic variation. Sexually reproduced planst combine the dominant genes from both the partent plants
As a mammal, a deer would be reproduced internally.
The fruit tree can be asexually reproduced through grafting, budding or sprouting, but the fruit itself would not exist if the tree had not reproduced sexually. The seed within the fruit is the proof of sexual reproduction.
They cannot. Should the sperm and egg of these two species meet, nothing will happen. Nature does not allow it. Only animals of similar genus - like lions and tigers, or horses and donkeys, can conceive outside their species. Most of the time their offspring is sterile.
Velociraptor reproduced sexually, having a mate. it laid it's eggs in a nest.
vasectomy and tubal lugation explaine how they affect reproduction in humans
it would occur in the north of pensacola
If your brain overheats, you instantly die.
No. Humans will never grow fins because we have no use for them. A characteristic will evolve because slight variations (the very beginning of that characteristic) improved the survival chances of an organism so that it survived and reproduced at the expense of others that did not have this variation. So it is possible that if some stone-age humans tried to live an aquatic lifestyle, then you may see things like webbing between the fingers. This is extremely unlikely and is a poor example of evolution, because humans would be far more likely to invent something to fill this need, even stone age humans. I cannot actually think of a single situation where humans having rudimentary fins would lead to some humans surviving and others dying.
Weathering is a NATURAL process that would occur without humans on the planet. However, human activities, particularly the dumping of acidic gases (Carbon Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide made as a byproduct of industry) into the atmosphere causes rainwater to become more acid than it would be if humans were not doing this. This acid rainwater speeds up the rate of weathering, particularly of limestone rocks.
Nothing would happen. Humans ARE animals.