0
What else can I help you with?
What would it be like without uranium?
There would be no nuclear power plants.
How would terrorist attack a nuclear power plants?
Nuclear power plants have extremely tight security. More to the point, however, WikiAnswers will not provide information about illegal, terrorist activities.
Would Nuclear Power Plants be Economical Without Govermental support?
Yes.!
What is the largest problem with nuclear power?
Under present world financial conditions I would say that the very high costs of building nuclear plants is a big problem. In the long term, dealing with the radioactive waste and decommissioning the plants safely.
If nuclear power was in Australia where would the plants be?
All nuclear power plants (Australian or otherwise) need to be located near a source of cooling water. That means being near a river or lake or sea.
How many power plants can be replaced by a nuclear power plant?
It varies depending on the capacity of each power plant, but generally speaking, one nuclear power plant can replace multiple coal-fired power plants due to the higher energy output of nuclear energy.
Where would you dispose the radioactive material from nuclear power plants when you run out of disposal grounds?
NIMBY
Why do you need nuclear power plants?
Nuclear power plants are used to generate electricity by harnessing the heat produced from nuclear reactions. They provide a source of low-carbon energy that can help meet the growing demand for electricity without contributing to greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, nuclear power is a reliable and consistent energy source that can operate continuously and produce large amounts of electricity.
Why would you want a scientist working on a nuclear power plant?
Governments want scientists to work on a nuclear power plant to lessen the dependence of fossil fuels. The product of nuclear power plants are atomic energy, a clean energy alternative.
Why the USA don't like other countries develop their nuclear power?
It's certainly not just the USA and it's not the "nuclear power" their concerned about, it's the by-products of making nuclear power that can be made into nuclear bombs and it's just "certain" country's that may use the nuclear plants to make nuclear bombs or to sell the Uranium to other country's that would make bombs. It would be an easy way for those country's to make easy money. And you can bet that money wouldn't make it to the people of the country that sold it. Think about it a minute, would you like your country's enemy to have access to those ingredients and not yours? It takes a lot of knowledge and responsibly, to the world in genera,l for a country to have nuclear power and let alone the safety aspects of it. Almost every country has had minor or massive accidents with nuclear power. Just look at Japan now, theirs was considered one of the safest nuclear plants in the world.
What would happen if the world had no weapons or no nuclear power?
Some one would invent them
Does Malaysia have nuclear power plants?
No it doesn't having Nuclear powere station The correct answer would be 'currently' Malaysia does not have any nuclear power plants but the government has announced the plan to build 2 nuclear power plants by 2020. As Malaysia has been heavily reliant on gas (around 60%) and coal (30%) the government would like to diversify the energy production and start using nuclear energy as the power generation for the rising electricity demand since it is cheaper in comparative. To produce 1,000 megawatts for one year 20 million tonnes of coal are need whereas only 30 tonnes of uranium are needed. I think this is a sufficient answer; Malaysia will have two nuclear power plants within the next decade or so.
