In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent: 1492
MCDXCII = 1492 M = 1000 CD = 400 (literally 100 before 500) XC = 90 (literally 10 before 100) II = 2
1000 : M 400 : CD 90 : XC 2 : II Accordingly, 1492 : MCDXCII
1492 but it should be written as MCCCCLXXXXII or XMDII and not as MCDXCIIThis is incorrect. "MCDXCII" is the proper way to write '1492' in Roman numerals.1) No symbol is ever used more than three times to write a given number, so MCCCCLXXXXII is incorrect2) X is 10 and M is 1000. No numeral should be subtracted from another numeral more than 10 times its value, so expressing 1990 as "XM" is incorrect. '1490' should be expressed as "MCDXC"."MCDXCII" therefore stands for '1492' in Roman numerals.
It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.
MCDXCII
M=1000, CD =400, XC=90, II=2 so MCDXCII is 1492
MCDXCII NumeralNumberM1000D500C100L50X10V5I1
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent: 1492
MCDXCII = 1492 M = 1000 CD = 400 (literally 100 before 500) XC = 90 (literally 10 before 100) II = 2
1000 : M 400 : CD 90 : XC 2 : II Accordingly, 1492 : MCDXCII
1492 but it should be written as MCCCCLXXXXII or XMDII and not as MCDXCIIThis is incorrect. "MCDXCII" is the proper way to write '1492' in Roman numerals.1) No symbol is ever used more than three times to write a given number, so MCCCCLXXXXII is incorrect2) X is 10 and M is 1000. No numeral should be subtracted from another numeral more than 10 times its value, so expressing 1990 as "XM" is incorrect. '1490' should be expressed as "MCDXC"."MCDXCII" therefore stands for '1492' in Roman numerals.
It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.
The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.
Yes, when used as an adjective. Year-to-year is hyphenated when used as an adjective: year-to-year comparison, year-to-year budget. Year to year is not hyphenated when it is used as a time period: We come back to this same beach year to year.
the year last year was 2010
Once a year. Every year. Year, after year, after year.............