Nowadays the equivalent of 1961 in Roman numerals are MCMLXI but the ancient Romans would have notated them quite differently
MCMLXI
1961
In today's terms they represent 1961
III-XXX-MCMLXI
In today's notation of Roman numerals: XXII-VI-MCMLXI
MCMLXI
MCMLXI
1961
In today's terms they represent 1961
Mcmlxi would be 1000 900 50 11 so 1961 Mcmlvi would be 1000 900 50 6. Or 1956
In compliance with today's rules it is: MCMLXI
III-XXX-MCMLXI
In today's notation of Roman numerals: XXII-VI-MCMLXI
M= 1000 c= 100 mmc= 1900 lx=60 i=1 mcmlxi= 1961
It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.It is the year 1799.
The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.The year 21BC. It is not 20BC, as there is no year zero.
Yes, when used as an adjective. Year-to-year is hyphenated when used as an adjective: year-to-year comparison, year-to-year budget. Year to year is not hyphenated when it is used as a time period: We come back to this same beach year to year.