The only decent attempt at a 5th generation programming language was done by japan in the 90's and it was based on prolog. It was deemed too slow and inefficient to be of viable use, and as such there has been no marketable 5gl to date, so the question would have been better posed as 'Is there a fifth generation programming language?' - also note that the idea of 5gl is just that, an idea. Even if we succeed in creating a 5gl, it will be 'A' 5gl language, not 'THE' 5gl language
There is no such thing. Until the introduction of third generation hardware, languages were never actually classified by generation. They were either low-level symbolic languages or high-level abstract languages and that hasn't changed to this day. The terms 3GL, 4GL and 5GL are nothing more than buzzwords adopted by the software industry for marketing purposes but they have no practical meaning as no such specification exists to define them. Historically, the term 3GL arose after the introduction of third generation hardware. Thus all previous high-level languages became known as 2GL while assembler became 1GL. But it was all done reflexively as a result of market hype. Since then, we've seen 4GL and 5GL applied to programming languages but no-one can actually agree on what these terms really mean. They are marketing buzzwords, nothing more. In some cases, 4GL and 5GL is nothing more than 3GL with some enhancement. In others, 4GL and 5GL are a completely new form of language altogether. Ultimately, comparing two 5GL languages is like comparing chalk with cheese. The term tells us nothing about the actual software. Some attempts have been made to clearly define the difference between 4GL and 5GL. To some, a 4GL is a domain-specific language (DSL) while to others it is a subset of DSL. Meanwhile 5GL is generally regarded as being intended for artificial intelligence applications. However, just as with 1GL, these are merely reflexive definitions attempting to make sense of the meaningless. Unless the industry as a whole can formally agree upon what 6GL means, then it will be just as meaningless. All we can say for sure is that 6GL will follow 5GL. But that doesn't mean it is any better than 5GL, only that it is newer in some way.
They are meaningless buzzwords. The term 3GL came first after the introduction of third generation hardware. Although some languages have claimed to be 4GL and 5GL, they are all informal classifications, buzzwords adopted by marketing types that have no specific meaning. All high-level languages are correctly classified according to their type: imperative; declarative; functional; object-oriented; and so on.
The main advantage of fifth-generation programming language is that it is designed to make the computer solve problems for you. Previously, programmers would need to know algorithms to fix the problems, but fifth-generation handles all of that on its own.
"Fixed" means that the ends cannot translate and cannot rotate. So, the beam cannot translate and cannot rotate
5th Generation Language
The only decent attempt at a 5th generation programming language was done by japan in the 90's and it was based on prolog. It was deemed too slow and inefficient to be of viable use, and as such there has been no marketable 5gl to date, so the question would have been better posed as 'Is there a fifth generation programming language?' - also note that the idea of 5gl is just that, an idea. Even if we succeed in creating a 5gl, it will be 'A' 5gl language, not 'THE' 5gl language
how much is a 5gl wooden scotch barrel worth
There is no such thing. Until the introduction of third generation hardware, languages were never actually classified by generation. They were either low-level symbolic languages or high-level abstract languages and that hasn't changed to this day. The terms 3GL, 4GL and 5GL are nothing more than buzzwords adopted by the software industry for marketing purposes but they have no practical meaning as no such specification exists to define them. Historically, the term 3GL arose after the introduction of third generation hardware. Thus all previous high-level languages became known as 2GL while assembler became 1GL. But it was all done reflexively as a result of market hype. Since then, we've seen 4GL and 5GL applied to programming languages but no-one can actually agree on what these terms really mean. They are marketing buzzwords, nothing more. In some cases, 4GL and 5GL is nothing more than 3GL with some enhancement. In others, 4GL and 5GL are a completely new form of language altogether. Ultimately, comparing two 5GL languages is like comparing chalk with cheese. The term tells us nothing about the actual software. Some attempts have been made to clearly define the difference between 4GL and 5GL. To some, a 4GL is a domain-specific language (DSL) while to others it is a subset of DSL. Meanwhile 5GL is generally regarded as being intended for artificial intelligence applications. However, just as with 1GL, these are merely reflexive definitions attempting to make sense of the meaningless. Unless the industry as a whole can formally agree upon what 6GL means, then it will be just as meaningless. All we can say for sure is that 6GL will follow 5GL. But that doesn't mean it is any better than 5GL, only that it is newer in some way.
It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.It is memory that cannot be changed.
im sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot computeim sorry but cannot compute So sorry but cannot compute
It depends on who you are referring to - I cannot = no puedo you (familiar) cannot = no puedes he/she/you (formal) cannot = no puede we cannot = no podemos they cannot = no pueden
energy cannot be air, cannot be destroyed, cannot be created
They are meaningless buzzwords. The term 3GL came first after the introduction of third generation hardware. Although some languages have claimed to be 4GL and 5GL, they are all informal classifications, buzzwords adopted by marketing types that have no specific meaning. All high-level languages are correctly classified according to their type: imperative; declarative; functional; object-oriented; and so on.
A puddle of water cannot exist in a square matrix. A sweet taste cannot; a clever idea cannot. Lots of things cannot.
No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.No, kangaroos cannot speak English.
you cannot you cannot