If I were Madame Forestier in the story "The Necklace," I would have been more understanding and empathetic towards Mathilde when she returned the borrowed necklace. I would have reassured her that the necklace was actually a fake, preventing the years of hardship that Mathilde endured due to her assumption that it was real.
The Loisels do not tell Madame Forestier that they lost the necklace because they were ashamed and afraid of the consequences. They were worried about how Madame Forestier would react to the news, given the value of the necklace and their inability to replace it. Additionally, they hoped they could somehow find a way to replace it without her ever finding out.
Madame Loisel borrows a necklace from Madame Forestier to wear to a fancy ball because she wants to appear wealthy and well-dressed. She wants to fit in with the upper-class society at the ball and feel more confident and elegant for the evening.
The main character in the story "The Necklace" is Mathilde Loisel, a woman who dreams of a lavish lifestyle despite her modest means. Her desire to fit in with the wealthy leads to a series of unfortunate events after she borrows a necklace to wear to a fancy event.
The reason she did not tell you is because you should have read the story
The main characters in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant are Mathilde Loisel, a discontented middle-class woman, and her husband, Monsieur Loisel. Madame Forestier is a wealthy friend of Mathilde's who lends her the necklace that becomes the catalyst for the story's events.
To improve the story "The Diamond Necklace," I could have added a twist ending where Madame Loisel discovers the necklace was actually fake, teaching her a valuable lesson about the importance of honesty and humility. This would have added depth to the story's moral and made it more thought-provoking for readers.
In "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, the antagonist can be seen as Mathilde's own greed, vanity, and desire for social status. The necklace itself also serves as a symbol of these negative qualities as it leads to the downfall of the main characters.
Mme Loisell, who borrows the thing from her (friend) Mme Forestier- which means Forester. Parks would not be a bad translation. In a sense MMe Forestier is the antagonist, though fatal pride- and maybe alcohol played a role. I think she ( Loisell) was drunk when she lost the necklace at the party.. and waited too long to report it... that would explain why she did not call up MMe Forestier when she first noticed the item ( which she believed to be worth 60 Grand plus) was missing.
The protagonist of Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" is Mathilde Loisel, a discontented woman who yearns for a more luxurious lifestyle. The antagonist can be interpreted as Mathilde's own dissatisfaction and greed, which lead her to borrow a necklace to wear to a fancy event, setting off a chain of events that ultimately lead to her downfall.
She wants her to see what despair and trouble that necklace had cost her and want her to feel guilty but in the end she get a suprise #Sabrina
"The Necklace" is a short story about Madame Loisel, who borrows a necklace to wear to a fancy party and loses it. To replace it, she and her husband sacrifice their comfortable life and struggle to pay off the debt over many years, only to discover that the original necklace was actually fake. The story conveys the theme of the destructive nature of greed and the importance of humility.
One example of foreshadowing in "The Necklace" is when Madame Loisel dreams of being wealthy and wearing expensive dresses. This foreshadows her later downfall when she borrows a necklace to wear to a fancy party and ends up losing it, leading to financial ruin. Her desire for a luxurious life and her eventual tragic fate are hinted at through this early dream sequence.