Want this question answered?
Prepare an imdictmemt
The judge issued a conditional pardon, all terms must be met before the defendant is released.
The judge is required by law to sentence a charge for the defendant is found guilty of. When defendant is found guilty of multiple felony convictions, the must be sentenced for each one.
That can only be answered by the presiding judge in the case. The defendant's attorney would have to ask the judge's permission for the defendant's absence. As a practical matter, this is likely only to be granted during pre-trial proceedings. For the trial, the defendant is required to be present.
A fair trial must be held in a timely fashion. A fair trial must be held in public with a jury, unless the defendant does not want a public trial and the judge agrees. The jury must be unbiased and represent a cross section of the population. The defendant must be given the time and resources to hire an attorney and formulate a defense. All evidence against the defendant must have been legally obtained.
Yes. A judge can direct the jury but cannot force them to a verdict. For example - the judge may say something like "..If you are satisfied the defendant acted maliciously, then you must find him guilty of murder. If not, then you must find him guilty of manslaughter..."
Also, known as the plaintiff is the person who brings up a lawsuit against the defendant. This person must prove there case to a judge in a court of law. It is the plaintiff responsible to argue his complaint to the judge.
It isn't. In law, the plaintiff makes a complaint that he has been wronged by the defendant. The defendant must defend himself against the plaintiff's action. In some places, the accused person in a criminal case is also called a defendant; here again, the accusation has been brought against him and he must defend against it, if only by making the general denial implied by a plea of not guilty.
I do not believe that there is a 'set' number of times. Defendants do have the privilege of changing their attorney's "for good cause." But a defendant cannot postpone his trial indefinitely by using this method. Eventually the judge will assign him an attorney the judge knows to be competent and the trial will proceed with the defendant's approval, or not.
His insight is he must not judge himself to harshly and he must respect himself. "How may I live without my name I have given you my soul; leave me my name!" "He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him!"
It COULD be the judge in the case, but nowadays, in many states, the state legislatures have passed what is known as Mandatory Minimum terms for certain crimes. This means that the judges do not have discretion to sentence the defendant, but MUST sentence the defendant to the time specified by the legislature.
A judge or jury must reach the decision that the defendant is guilty beyond a REASONABLE doubt. Not beyond ALL doubt - just "reasonable" doubt.