0
When a hypothesis is not correct what should or would a good researcher do?
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Explain why it is not correct then reformulate a new hypothosis.
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How will you find out if the hypothesis is correct or not?
It's an awfully vague question, but according to the scientific method, you would experiment.Scientific method:Ask a questionResearchConstruct a hypothesisTest the hypothesis by doing an experimented (an independent researcher should be able to replicate the experiment, under the same conditions, and achieve the same results)Analyze your data and draw a conclusionShare your results
The scientists of wegeners time should have accepted his hypothesis why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
Is this true determining the problem is the first step in the scientific method?
No. Asking a question is the first step in the scientific method--a question like "why does this happen?" This sparks research, then you would come up with a hypothesis as to the answer to your question. After that you would conduct experiments in order to prove your hypothesis correct. Then you would analyze your results and come to your conclusions. If your hypothesis was correct, you would then report your findings, if not, then you would have to come up with a new hypotheses, and repeat the process over again.
Why should hypotheses testable?
How else would you determine the validity of the hypothesis.
How will you find out if the hypothesis is correct or not?
It's an awfully vague question, but according to the scientific method, you would experiment.Scientific method:Ask a questionResearchConstruct a hypothesisTest the hypothesis by doing an experimented (an independent researcher should be able to replicate the experiment, under the same conditions, and achieve the same results)Analyze your data and draw a conclusionShare your results
The scientists of wegeners time should have accepted his hypothesis why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
The scientists of wegeners time should have accepted his hypothesis .why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
The scientists of wegener's time should have accepted his hypothesis Why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
How do you come up with a hypothesis for a lab?
The lab would be used to test your hypothesis to whether or not you were correct. You would first want to form a hypothesis and then gather data to support or discredit your hypothesis. The hypothesis could be testing anything essentially.
In what order should you conduct the following steps to test your hypothesis?
That would depend on your hypothesis!
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
Is this true determining the problem is the first step in the scientific method?
No. Asking a question is the first step in the scientific method--a question like "why does this happen?" This sparks research, then you would come up with a hypothesis as to the answer to your question. After that you would conduct experiments in order to prove your hypothesis correct. Then you would analyze your results and come to your conclusions. If your hypothesis was correct, you would then report your findings, if not, then you would have to come up with a new hypotheses, and repeat the process over again.
What come after hypothesis?
A theory
A medical researcher hypothesis that a newly developed medication can reduce high blood pressure Which of these would most likely be the dependent variable in a study involving this medication?
The blood pressure of the participants in the study
Why should hypotheses testable?
How else would you determine the validity of the hypothesis.
