If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
The experiment that you will design is done to test the hypothesis.
Try to come up with a different hypothesis that seems to be supported by the data.
Hypothesis is examined very closely to see what it predicts, and the predictions are then rigorously tested. If the predictions are not supported by the results of experiments, the hypothesis is rejected but if they are confirmed, the hypothesis is supported.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
it is better at their work
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
they see if it supported their hypothesis
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
several times, and must get agreement from the scientific community
you should go to the next ster
supported by enough data to become a theory.
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
The experiment that you will design is done to test the hypothesis.
Try to come up with a different hypothesis that seems to be supported by the data.