Want this question answered?
The Grand Jury is to decide if the evidence warrants prosecution.
A hear say evidence is not enough for a person to be indicted.
The person does not have enough digestive enzymes.The person does not have enough digestive enzymes.
The person does not have enough digestive enzymes.The person does not have enough digestive enzymes.
A jury is what determines if you are guilty, after being presented with evidence and hearing what the person accused is being charged for.
The navigator
It means that there is enough evidence to lead a "reasonable person" to believe that there is sufficient evidence to supports the facts that are in in dispute.
History
Yes, if the person incriminates themselves in a crime or if there is enough evidence to support an arrest.
Fingerprints alone are typically not enough evidence for conviction as they only prove that a person was present at a certain location. Other evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, DNA evidence, or surveillance footage, is usually needed to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Yes, a jury decides if a person is guilty or not guilty.
It is called being subpoenaed to court to testify as a witness.