Want this question answered?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
I would not even begin to plan an explanation until I knew what the experimental results are.
false
The results may influence future investigations conducted by other scientists. STUPID STUDY ISLAND....
If the personal opinion of a scientist affects the way that the experimental results are reported, that is called bias.
with a good idea of the expected experimental results.
repeated trials
scientists will generally repeat the experiment until they they do match
Apex.The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.
Because it helps them know the results of the objects in the experiment and how they differ. This way the scientist knows which succeeded and which failed.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
The scientific method and peer review are two methods that a scientist uses to obtain empirical evidence. Experimental design and reproduction of results are two other methods.
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
We are currently in the experimental stage.They have a very experimental love live.These experimental conditions are not good enough.