Want this question answered?
little to none
Third parties can represent a threat to the political process when they fragment the voter base, leading to potential vote splitting that could allow a less popular candidate to win. Additionally, they may contribute to political polarization by siphoning votes away from more moderate candidates, thereby reducing the chances of consensus-building and cooperation in government.
It stopped it is over
no
If you spill liquid nitrogen over fire, the fire would stop immediately and it would have smoke on the ice.
Freeze it first. Alternatively, fill it with oil so that when you knock it over it won't be water that you spill.
Yes,it is ovr=er
It will spill?
When Marjory accidentally tipped over her glass, she spilled milk everywhere.
over your right shoulder with your left hand
In the US, there is no limitations on the number of political parties. With that said, much like the UK, it's difficult for a third party to gain much traction with voters. The US citizen relies on either the Republican or Democratic parties. In the UK, the voter, for the most part chooses between Labor or Conservative parties.
Historically speaking, third parties have had a limited influence on American politics. Currently, the two major American parties--the Democrats and Republicans--have deliberately crafted platforms designed to address most of the concerns of the voting public. However, it is possible for a third party to seize political advantage by successfully arguing that existing parties are not offering a sufficient solution to a pressing problem. In this way, third parties that gain momentum usually do so by aligning themselves with one particular cause, such as debt reduction or immigration. By leveraging one specific argument, that resonates with an identifiable segment of the voting public, third parties can temporarily present themselves as fresh alternatives to the "stagnant" positions of Democrats and Republicans. Over the long term, however, it becomes very difficult for a third party to remain new in the eyes of the voter and failure to win office consistently makes it difficult to secure the funding needed to sustain a challenge to established parties.