Want this question answered?
Good free site for geneology is worldgenweb.org, which contains expert information regarding genealogical and historical records.
Much of these charts were written in the Dresden Codex, a document smuggled out of Central America at a time when the Spanish were destroying Mayan documents, regarding them as pagan.
Historical accounts of slavery vary widely because different cultures treated slaves differently. Accounts of slavery within the same culture may also differ due to the sources' perception and beliefs regarding slavery coloring their accounts.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
You will find the provisions regarding clemency in Section V.
This means information about historical past events regarding the research in question.
There does not appear to be any study of historical writings regarding The Simpsons.
The burden of proof regarding causation is on the plantiff. Causation is important because - sometimes - a person may have died in a hospital (for example) for reasons other than negligence (for example, a pre-existing condition rather than actual negligence...and negligence must be proven). Typically, an expert witness will show causation (or an act of negligence) for the plantiff, but the defense counsel will rigorously oppose any plantiff expert witness. The litmus test for neglegence is usually permanent harm or death. Otherwise, the odds are lessened in a personal injury suit.
Yes rebelling child, your parents have a say in what you do at school.
There is no direct evidence of historical navel piercing, although there is a great deal of historical evidence regarding the decoration of the navel, both for ritual and aesthetic purposes.
Historical background has to do with information regarding the formation date, time of the event, activities, and the business that occurred. What was the cause or causes that lead to this happening and so much more.
International laws regarding the foriegn possession of historical artifacts are enforced by Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.
Good free site for geneology is worldgenweb.org, which contains expert information regarding genealogical and historical records.
For the most part, US President John F. Kennedy receives high marks from historians regarding government secrecy. There is a consensus among most US historians that Kennedy was the only president after WW 2 to show any interest in slowing down the secrecy machine. His successors and their administrations seemed to have thrived on secrecy.
If you planted your flag, then that country owned it. This was how people would take over new lands.
English bill of rights, the enlightenment period of the 1700's, the mayflower compact, british rule.
A historical letter from Colt would be your best bet. They cost, but, are worth it.