A famine is what you are thinking of.
The royals let the people starve.
People risked their lives to get food to them. If they got caught, the people in the annex would just have to starve.
because the rich people in Vietnam [there were few] would have to give away their money to the poor people. everyone would be equal, making the poor not as poor as before.
what did poor people eat and drink in the victorian era
Over 1,000 to 1,050 homeless people dye. 15% of them dye, the rest starve. Poor people!
They will if they're not fed properly, or given poor quality feed that they will simply starve to death on.
People did not starve, and in some cases were able to store food against times of poor harvests.
We'll starve!
Because there are economy problems and the government doesn't try their hardest to make sure there is social balance (keadilan sosial) for the poor people in Indonesia.
Charles II, on his deathbed, referring to his mistress Nell Gwynn.
Not at all. However, the spread between rich and poor is much more pronounced. In the USA or UK or Canada, there are rich people and poor people but generally the rich are reasonably rich and the poor still usually have a roof over their heads, or, even if homeless, are able not to starve because of a welfare state. However, in India the rich tend to be very very rich, whilst the poor are very very poor - and there are a lot more poor people than in western countries, so, on average, India can be thought of as a poor country although there are many living there who are very rich.
Only 43% of the population is considered poor ---- 43% to other countries. They live fine for the most part. They don't starve and most have their own homes.
-1000000000000000000
yes
yes
They starve to death