In John Steinbeck's book, the Pearl, the rich have power over the poor when they are able to manipulate the buying price of the pearl. They have tons of money, and yet they still try to take advantage of the poor by giving them way less than they deserve. The poor folk can't change that at all, and so they are forced to either sell the pearl for that price or not at all. This catch 22, so to speak, is when the rich have power over the poor.
In "The Pearl," the rich have power over the poor through economic exploitation. They manipulate the system to maintain their wealth and control over resources, often at the expense of the poorer members of society. The divide between the rich and the poor is emphasized through the unequal distribution of opportunities, creating a cycle of poverty for the marginalized.
when the doctor gives the baby poison to cure it he takes advantage of kino, when the priest says he could marry kino and juana or baptise the baby, and when the pearl buyers try to get them down to the lowest price and then sell them for a much higher price.
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
Japan has a adapted to the fact that it is a population rich/power poor country by trying to get power from nuclear power plants that they are building.
No, the rich people wanted to get rid of the kings so they decided to get rid of them, but they couldn't do it on their own, so they decided to get the poor men to do it for them. But the poor men wanted something in return, so the rich people said ok, if you fight for us we wil give you power, so the poor men said yes to the rich people and they went to fight. When the fight was over and the poor men had won, the poor men went to ask for their power but instead the rich people didn't want to give them any power. And blah blah blah.
K
Rich And Poor.
rich and poor
It is rich and poor . It is rich and poor .
Neither, not rich or poor.
who knows the lady can be rich or poor who knows the lady can be rich or poor who knows the lady can be rich or poor
Not at all. However, the spread between rich and poor is much more pronounced. In the USA or UK or Canada, there are rich people and poor people but generally the rich are reasonably rich and the poor still usually have a roof over their heads, or, even if homeless, are able not to starve because of a welfare state. However, in India the rich tend to be very very rich, whilst the poor are very very poor - and there are a lot more poor people than in western countries, so, on average, India can be thought of as a poor country although there are many living there who are very rich.
poor
not rich or poor