0
What else can I help you with?
What is one case in which the supreme court upheld a restriction on symbolic speech?
Do your history homework next time
Was The Supreme Court on several occasions has upheld automatic expatriation?
FALSE! The Supreme Court has never upheld automatic expatration.
Laws against seditious speech have been upheld by the supreme court if they do?
Unsure of exactly what it is that is being asked, however - - (in the US) Sedition is defined as the stirring up of rebellion against the government. Treason is the violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or state, giving aid to enemies, or levying war against one's state. Sedition is encouraging one's fellow citizens to rebel against their state, whereas treason is actually betraying one's country by aiding and abetting another state. Sedition laws somewhat equate to terrorism and so-called 'public order' laws. See below link:
What law was upheld as constitutional in the supreme court case of schenck v. United states?
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies
Who won tinker vs des moines?
The people who won the Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) case were the students (Tinker) whose First Amendment right freedom of speech was upheld by the Supreme Court.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
What law was upheld as constitutional on the supreme court case of scheck v. US?
In the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act of 1917. The decision established that speech creating a "clear and present danger" to national security, particularly during wartime, is not protected by the First Amendment. This ruling set a precedent for limiting free speech in certain contexts, emphasizing the balance between civil liberties and national security.
Which supreme court upheld the constitutionality of the second bank of the United states?
they had a baby
When was same-sex marriage first brought up in court?
In 1971, the Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled against the right of same-sex couples to marry in Baker v. Nelson, a decision that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972.
What is the effect of New Jersey v tlo?
i think that the supreme court regulate the evidence against T.l.o purse that it was legal and not against the law to limit the supreme power against the 4th amendment supreme court made it clear that she had denial that she smoked and the search for cigarettes and rolling papers, a further search was reasonable. Because the search was reasonable, the supreme court admitted the evidence that had been used in the delinquency proceedings. it reversed the new jersey supreme court ruling and upheld T.L.O.'S sentence for delinquency.
What law waa upheld as constitutonal in the supreme Court cade of schenk v. united States?
In the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act of 1917. The ruling established that speech presenting a "clear and present danger" to national security, particularly during wartime, is not protected by the First Amendment. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously articulated that the government could restrict speech that poses a significant threat to public safety or national interests. This case set a precedent for the limits of free speech in the context of national security.
How did the supreme court rule on Texas vs Johnson and Virginia vs black?
In Texas v. Johnson (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment, stating that the government cannot prohibit expression simply because it is offensive. In Virginia v. Black (2003), the Court upheld laws against cross burning but clarified that such acts could not be banned solely based on the act itself, as it could be considered protected speech unless it was intended to intimidate. Together, these rulings highlight the balance between free speech and the regulation of hate speech.
Koremastu v U.S.?
The Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Japanese relocation
