Do your history homework next time
Seditious speech is that which is anti-government and is treasonous. The Constitution protects free speech no matter the subject, unless the speech is meant to incite violence or overthrow of the government.
FALSE! The Supreme Court has never upheld automatic expatration.
The Supreme Court found in favor of the students in the Tinker case because it upheld their First Amendment right to free speech, ruling that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Court determined that the students' wearing of black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was a form of symbolic speech that did not disrupt school activities. This landmark decision emphasized the importance of protecting free expression, even in a school setting.
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies
The people who won the Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) case were the students (Tinker) whose First Amendment right freedom of speech was upheld by the Supreme Court.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
In the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act of 1917. The decision established that speech creating a "clear and present danger" to national security, particularly during wartime, is not protected by the First Amendment. This ruling set a precedent for limiting free speech in certain contexts, emphasizing the balance between civil liberties and national security.
they had a baby
of free expression
In the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act of 1917. The ruling established that speech presenting a "clear and present danger" to national security, particularly during wartime, is not protected by the First Amendment. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously articulated that the government could restrict speech that poses a significant threat to public safety or national interests. This case set a precedent for the limits of free speech in the context of national security.
The Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Japanese relocation
Confinement in internment camps
Dred Scott.