When the harassment results in a tangible employment action regardless of whether upper management had knowledge of it is when an agency is automatically liable for harassment by a supervisor.
When the harassment results in a tangible employment action regardless of whether upper management had knowledge of it is when an agency is automatically liable for harassment by a supervisor.
Yes. Any person committing acts of sexual harassment or allowing them to continue or retaliating against a person who made a harassment complaint may be held personally liable. The company is not always the one that is responsible. In many cases a person who sexually harasses another is held liable while the company is not if the company can prove it acted promptly and appropriately to stop the harassment once the situation became known.
no
Agency : principle is liable for the act of agent and agent get fees or commission from the principle. Franchise : Principle is not liable for the act of agent and PRINCIPAL get fees of commission form the agent.
== == == ==
yes. Always responsible.
The full dollar amount
There is no limit as long as each complaint is legitimate and not intended for purposes of harassment. If you file frivolous lawsuits you may become liable for the defendant's legal costs and punitive damages.
She has moved on. Stop bothering her. You could be liable for some kind of harassment problem if you continue. There are lots of girls out there.
If someone hits a parked car then they are automatically liable.
For ones which occurred prior to the agency taking possession of the vehicle, yes.
Agency law governs what kinds of activities businesses can delegate. It also governs what kinds of acts a business can be held liable for.