Want this question answered?
No, there has not been a conflict.
The outcome of the battle convinced France to militarily intervene in the conflict, supporting the Patriots.
No. The United Nations continually proposed ceasefires and one of them eventually led to the armistice that ended the war, but the United Nations did not physically intervene in the conflict.
bush feared a tangled conflict without clear resolution
To protect the independence of American states, the US would, if necessary, exercise its power as the policeman of the Western Hemisphere. In other words, Europe was to keep out of the affairs of South and North America, but the US would act, using military force if necessary, and intervene in nations south of our border if necessary to protect our interests.
No, there has not been a conflict.
by sending them to jail
They didn't
no it has not
Has the in ever intervened in a conflict involving australia
nope
The outcome of the battle convinced France to militarily intervene in the conflict, supporting the Patriots.
2
I don't think so
No. The United Nations continually proposed ceasefires and one of them eventually led to the armistice that ended the war, but the United Nations did not physically intervene in the conflict.
bush feared a tangled conflict without clear resolution.
the gods are aware of human's behavior, and will intervene if necessary (this is what was believed during Homer's time)