its not.only if its written with almost every detail put into it.promises are normally verbal and therefor not a contract.
the promisor in a contract may also called Obligor.The promisor is a law term that refers to the party who is on the receiving end of a promise. The party making the promise is the promisee.Actually it's the other way around- a promisee is on the receiving end, while the promisor is the one making the promise. In a bilateral contract (I promise to give you my car, you promise to give me $10,000), both parties are promisor and promisee because they are each making a promise and receiving a promise.
No, but a license may be.
A unilateral promise in when just one of the parties to a contract agrees to do something. A bilateral promise is when both parties agree to perform under the contract.
A bilateral contract.
contract, agreement, undertaking, commitmant, pledge, promise, engage, warrant. If they dont help, use a thesaurus!!!Some other words for covenant are: Contract, agree, stipulate, undertake, engage, bargain, pact, agreement contract (or 'contract of agreement')
in a contract you are legally bound by it and a promise is something u just make someone. so if u break your contract you could go to jail but if u break a promise you might lose a friend or who ever you made that promise with.
No, a changed contract is not considered a new contract as it is an amendment or modification of the original agreement. The changes made are typically done to update or adjust certain terms or conditions of the existing contract without creating an entirely new agreement.
Get them to sign a contract.
It can be called a covenant or a contract.
The definition of a bilateral contract is a contract that involves mutual promises where each party is both a promise and promisor. It is a formal agreement where two parties promise something in exchange for the other person's promise.
It can be called a covenant or a contract.
You should talk to an attorney to find out if that's still even a thing where you live ... in many places it is not. Breach of promise is a largely outdated legal concept. It's generally considered that women are actually people nowadays, believe it or not, so they're not entirely helpless and dependent upon a man, and the "promise" in question has no actual monetary value. Depending on the circumstances you might be able to sue to recover actual expenditures you incurred as a result of the wedding planning though. This is why you should talk to an attorney: breach of promise may be mostly dead, but breach of contract is alive and well, and a promise to marry is a verbal contract.