Want this question answered?
The whole of Great Britain was never conquered, except by itself. The country that would become Great Britain was conquered by the Celtic races, the Romans, the Angles, the Saxons, the Danes and Jutes (the last two are also known as the Vikings or Norseman), and the Normans. This would seem to be the end of being conquered.
Invaded? Possibly Conquered? That is about as likely as freezing fire.
The Romans found that they had the same deities only named differently. There was really no adaption necessary, except that the Romans used Roman names for the gods instead of the Greek names.
They sowed Carthage with salt as a symbolic victory gesture which said they had conquered the city and its empire and it would never grow to prominence again.
The Roman army was extremely important in the spreading of roman culture. The main way that it expanded roman culture was that the legionnaires who made up the majority of the early to imperial roman army were allowed to settle in territories their legion had conquered. For example many of the soldiers of the Roman legions that conquered the majority of Britain settled there. Many of these soldiers married a local women and this led to quite a rapid transformation of the culture. As many of these soldiers had children, the population would start to become more Roman until what was left was a fusion of Roman and local culture.
The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.
How did the Romans treated people they conquered?They would mostly leave them alone except if they didn't obey their rules.Rome Generally treated its defected enemies with justice.
The whole of Great Britain was never conquered, except by itself. The country that would become Great Britain was conquered by the Celtic races, the Romans, the Angles, the Saxons, the Danes and Jutes (the last two are also known as the Vikings or Norseman), and the Normans. This would seem to be the end of being conquered.
The Romans were resilient and would have made a comeback.
Greeks to a small extent. The Jews were another major group to resist Roman culture.
Rome treated conquered people generously. The knew the people would be more loyal to the government if treated like Romans.
Invaded? Possibly Conquered? That is about as likely as freezing fire.
The Romans found that they had the same deities only named differently. There was really no adaption necessary, except that the Romans used Roman names for the gods instead of the Greek names.
How did the Romans treated people they conquered?They would mostly leave them alone except if they didn't obey their rules.Rome Generally treated its defected enemies with justice.
It depends on the country the family is in.
They sowed Carthage with salt as a symbolic victory gesture which said they had conquered the city and its empire and it would never grow to prominence again.
The Roman army was extremely important in the spreading of roman culture. The main way that it expanded roman culture was that the legionnaires who made up the majority of the early to imperial roman army were allowed to settle in territories their legion had conquered. For example many of the soldiers of the Roman legions that conquered the majority of Britain settled there. Many of these soldiers married a local women and this led to quite a rapid transformation of the culture. As many of these soldiers had children, the population would start to become more Roman until what was left was a fusion of Roman and local culture.