Yes, this occurs fairly often. The justices review lower court cases petitioned to the Court under its appellate jurisdiction to determine whether the decision was correct based on the Court's interpretation of the Constitution and the law.
Yes, unless they can distinguish their case from the case the Supreme Court decided.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Federal state and judicial courts
Yes.
All the courts that are below it. If it is a federal appeals court, that means all courts in the country excepting the Supreme Court. If it is a provincial appeals court that means all courts below it in that particular province only.
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow precedents set by higher appellate courts under which jurisdiction the particular lower court falls.For example, in the federal court system US Supreme Court decisions create binding precedents for all US District Courts and US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts; however, Circuit Court decisions only set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territorial jurisdiction.The exception to this is decisions of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has nationwide jurisdiction (below that of the Supreme Court) over special subject-matter cases.
All of them. All states follow a three-tier system similar to the one used in the federal courts, but with names determined by the individual states.The three tiers help guarantee parties receive appropriate procedural due process:Trial Court (Federal: US District Courts)Intermediate Appellate (Federal: US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts)Final Appellate Court (Federal: Supreme Court of the United States)
When an appeal court decides a case, it issues a written opinion that sets a precedent for similar cases in the future. All lower courts in the jurisdiction where the precedent was issuesd must follow it
Follow the Appeals Process in the Related Link below.
Not directly. The US Supreme Court is the highest federal appellate court in the United States. Lower courts are supposed to follow precedents set by the Court's decisions, but the Supreme Court doesn't exercise operational control over the lower courts.
The simple answer is all of them. The more complex answer involves what was ruled on and whether it was Federal in nature or State in nature.
All of them. All states follow a three-tier system similar to the one used in the federal courts, but with names determined by the individual states.The three tiers help guarantee parties receive appropriate procedural due process:Trial Court (Federal: US District Courts)Intermediate Appellate (Federal: US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts)Final Appellate Court (Federal: Supreme Court of the United States)
People follow whatever customs and religions which appeals to them or brings them comfort.
US Supreme Court opinions (decisions) set binding precedents because all lower courts are required to follow the same reasoning when deciding similar cases under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
The US Supreme Court is head of the Judicial Branch of government. The "inferior" courts in this branch are:US District CourtsUS Court of International TradeUS Court of Appeals Circuit Courts
This legal doctrine is known as stare decisis, a latin term which means to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed. A prior judicial decision is commonly referred to as a precedent.