0
When the defense does a cross examination of the witness they will ask questions in an attempt to about the testimony?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
A. create doubt @
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agocross-examination
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When the defense does a crossexamination of the witness they will ask questions in an attempt to about the testimony?
The goals of cross-examination include discrediting the witness and telling the client's version of the events with the questions. The best book on cross-examination that I've read can be found here: http://www.relentlessdefense.com/relentless-criminal-cross-examination.html
When the defense does a cross-examination of the witness they will ask questions in an attempt to?
create doubt in the juries mind . . .Added: . . . . and impeach the witness if possible.
When the defense does a cross examination of the witness they will ask questions in attempt to?
create doubt in the juries mind . . .Added: . . . . and impeach the witness if possible.
When the defense does a cross examination of the witness they will ask questions in an attempt to what about a testimony?
Trial lawyers can use cross-examination to impeach a witness's testimony, thereby undermining the credibility of that witness on that particular point or as part of a general assault on the witness's veracity. But, good cross-examiners will when appropriate use cross-examination to elicit facts favorable to his side from the witness. It is, therefore, not necessarily the best strategy to attack every witness. See, http://www.relentlessdefense.com/relentless-criminal-cross-examination.html
When the defense does a cross examination of the witness they will ask question in an attempt to what about the testimony?
Trial lawyers can use cross-examination to impeach a witness's testimony, thereby undermining the credibility of that witness on that particular point or as part of a general assault on the witness's veracity. But, good cross-examiners will when appropriate use cross-examination to elicit facts favorable to his side from the witness. It is, therefore, not necessarily the best strategy to attack every witness. See, http://www.relentlessdefense.com/relentless-criminal-cross-examination.html
During the redirect examination the might ask the witness more questions to clarify anything that might be confusing?
defense
In tort claim if plaintiff's attorney does call a witness to testify can defense call same witness to testify against plaintiff?
The plaintiff is not required to provide witnesses to a case, per se; although they must prove their case (It is very hard to do without at least one witness, normally the plaintiff alone). In either case however the defense is not limited in its ability to call any witness to the case, as long as the plaintiff is notified of the witness who will appear and the witness will provide material testimony about the case.Additional: The defense cannot elicit brand-new testimony from the plaintiffs witness, however the witness is subject to cross-examination by the defense, who will try to either draw out testimony favorable to his client, or to impeach the testimony that the witness gave on direct examination.
How do you use word testimony in a sentence?
After the Prosecution's witness gave his testimony, the Defense cross-examined him. My testimony at church moved many people to a deeper relationship with God.
How do prosecution and defense attorneys attempt to strategize to ensure they get the best juror for their side?
you can attemp to ask questions of the juror that will help pick the right juror.
How do you use cross examination in a sentence?
The witness was not prepared for the defense attorney's brutal cross examination.
Cross-examination in a sentence?
The defense's most important witness completely fell apart under cross-examination.
When the defense does a cross-examination of the witness they will ask?
Trial lawyers can use cross-examination to impeach a witness's testimony, thereby undermining the credibility of that witness on that particular point or as part of a general assault on the witness's veracity. But, good cross-examiners will when appropriate use cross-examination to elicit facts favorable to his side from the witness. It is, therefore, not necessarily the best strategy to attack every witness. See, http://www.relentlessdefense.com/relentless-criminal-cross-examination.html
