Child marriage has only been a problem since the 1940s since that was when parents began to feel the need to shelter their children and provide "better lives". Children have been married off before they were even conceived for diplomatic reasons for centuries. In the case of Marie-Antoinette, her mother changed almost everything about her to marry her off and assure Austria safe from French invasion, but the marriage would only commence after Antonia (Marie) was able to bear children. I think she was around 13 or 14.
No problem,problem arise if 1st child is negative.But medicines cure it completely.
Not significantly on the rise in the US.
His father had a child from a previous marriage, but Robert is the only child from this marriage.
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar banned child marriage system ; but till date Uneducated people are continue this child marriage system.
If a father is O positive and a girl is A negative, this will not likely pose a problem with a baby. It may cause the mother to have to get a Rhogam shot when she is pregnant.
its like u r building a marriage without foundation is a problem
its like u r building a marriage without foundation is a problem
If you are still married, then telling the husband is the best thing to do, since it will come out in the end. The name of the child is the least of the problem--just do what makes sense in the long run for the child.
No. The obligation of child support does not arise or become enforceable until a child is born.
As long as the child can support himself or herself, and the parent is consenting, there is no problem.
scarcity
If the child is underage, a marriage license should not have been issue without both signatures.