what did they say
After the Boston tea party, British parliament passed the Coercive Acts or as the patriots would say the Intolerable Acts.
The colonists felt that the British government had no right to tax them because there were not any representatives of the colonies in the British Parliament. The colonies had no say in how much the taxes should be or what they should pay for. They didn't think this was fair.
The Colonists were mad about Intolerable Act because the British Parliament passed five laws during 1774 , and the Colonists had no say in anything. That was another reason for the Colonists to be mad at the British Government
Colonists in the sons of liberty harassed customs workers, stamp agents and sometimes royal governors
The colonists were angry because of the famous line "no taxation without representation." Britain kept passing acts and the colonists had no say. The Sugar Act and Townshend Acts had been passed before the Stamp Act. In the end, Britain did repeal (get rid of) the Stamp Act, but then passed an act requiring the colonists to house British soldiers.
The British Parliament could have taken several actions to resolve their differences with the colonists and strengthen relations with America. They could have given the colonists representation in Parliament, allowing them a say in the laws that affected them. They could have repealed the various taxation acts that fueled the colonists' grievances. Lastly, they could have engaged in more open and inclusive dialogue with colonial leaders to address their concerns and find common ground.
The Stamp Act, imposed by the British Parliament, required American colonists to purchase stamped paper for various documents and publications. But they had no say in the matter. It was taxation without representation. If you like this topic, we actually made a video about this on our YouTube channel (@FunkyHistory).
No. They were British acts that were passed before the revolution. The British were unconcerned about native Americans. The act was to punish Massachusetts for the Boston Tea Party and limited government in the colonies. It was for control.
the colonists got mad at the British parliament because they were being taxed without representation. this meant that the colonists were being taxed to the amount of what ever the British thought was right. after the french and Indian war, the British won, but lost a lot of money. to gain the money back, they taxed all the people who lived in the colonies. there are a lot of acts among the colonists that expressed their anger such as: the Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765, the Quartering act of 1765, the Townshend Act of 1767, the Boston Tea Party of 1773, and the intolerable Act
Boycott
The British parliamentary system was certainly an influence on the design of the US constitution, but remember that the US was created specifically as a revolution against the British system as well, so it would not be correct to say that the US is based on the British Parliament.
Typit was justiofield because i say so