Conclusion indicators
It is invalid because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.
Yes. If you do it, and follow through to the conclusion of the procedure, the result is 20 .
This describes one kind of statement that can appear in a logical syllogism or argument. If a given argument A is true, then it follows that argument B must be true. It does not automatically follow that if B is true, then A must be true.'All living humans are breathing animals' is true. [If you are a living human (A) you breathe (B).'All breathing animals are therefore human' is not true. [If you breathe (B) you are a living human (A).
A "conjecture" is a conclusion reached simply from observations...this is a process known as "inductive reasoning". An example would be a weather forecast. The difference between "inductive reasoning" and "deductive reasoning" is that with deductive reasoning, the answer must "necessarily" follow from a set of premises. Inductive reasoning is the process by which you make a mathematical "hypothesis" given a set of observations
The word follow has two syllables: "fol-low".
These types of words are called conclusion indicators. They signal to the listener or reader that the argument is reaching a conclusion based on the presented premises. Examples of conclusion indicators include "thus," "therefore," and "so".
It is invalid because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.
Non sequitur is Latin for "it does not follow". A statement is said to be a non sequitur if the conclusion does not follow from the premise.
Words like "because," "since," and "therefore" are indicators of premises and conclusions in arguments. They help link reasons (premises) to conclusions to make a persuasive case. Paying attention to these words can help you discern the structure and flow of an argument.
Premise 1 is false. Even if it were correct, conclusion 2 doesn't logically follow.
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive arguments are characterized by their validity, meaning that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.
A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.
Your first premise is false. Not all animals live on trees or in forests. There are animals that live on savannahs, in deserts, on polar ice caps, on cliff faces, and in the ocean. So if your first premise is false, your conclusion does not follow. It's the same for the second premise as well.
The form of this question incorportates a false premise. The premise is that the data are normally distributed. Actually, is the sample mean which, under certain circumstances, is normally distributed.
conclusion
I follow the instructions in my Owner's Manual.
No, the premise is incorrect. More than a dozen Muslim countries follow Islamic law in some way.