answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Conclusion indicators

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When these types of words are used in an argument they are the indicator that a premise has been made and a conclusion will soon follow?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When these type of words are used in an argument they are indicator that the premises had been made and a conclusion will soon follow?

These types of words are called conclusion indicators. They signal to the listener or reader that the argument is reaching a conclusion based on the presented premises. Examples of conclusion indicators include "thus," "therefore," and "so".


The argument that states People who major in engineering are good in math you are good in math so you should major in engineering is?

It is invalid because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.


What does non sequitur mean?

Non sequitur is Latin for "it does not follow". A statement is said to be a non sequitur if the conclusion does not follow from the premise.


When these types of words are used in an argument they are indicators that a premise has been made and a conclusion will soon follow?

Words like "because," "since," and "therefore" are indicators of premises and conclusions in arguments. They help link reasons (premises) to conclusions to make a persuasive case. Paying attention to these words can help you discern the structure and flow of an argument.


Premise 1 If being humble is thinking of others then does it logicly follow that if p 2 one were to buy an item for ones personal entertainment conclusion 2 one would be selfish and therefore greedy?

Premise 1 is false. Even if it were correct, conclusion 2 doesn't logically follow.


What is deductive argument?

A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive arguments are characterized by their validity, meaning that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.


How do you identify a strong or weak argument?

A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.


Which among the following is logically implied Statement -All animals either live on trees or in a forest Conclusion 1 All animals live on trees Conclusion 2 All animals live in a forest?

Your first premise is false. Not all animals live on trees or in forests. There are animals that live on savannahs, in deserts, on polar ice caps, on cliff faces, and in the ocean. So if your first premise is false, your conclusion does not follow. It's the same for the second premise as well.


Why do population follow normal distribution?

The form of this question incorportates a false premise. The premise is that the data are normally distributed. Actually, is the sample mean which, under certain circumstances, is normally distributed.


In good arguments of this sort the conclusion necessarily follows or must follow from the premises.a) Deductiveb PropositionscInductivedTrue?

conclusion


How do i Reset maintenance indicator on M ercedes?

I follow the instructions in my Owner's Manual.


Do fewer than a dozen countries follow Islamic law in some way?

No, the premise is incorrect. More than a dozen Muslim countries follow Islamic law in some way.