0
Free will means that God has given man the agency to act for himself. Whatever he does with that agency can either have a positive or negative affect upon his or others lives. The free will or agency of man has at times harmed others. All wars were started by the unwise use of agency. It is very rarely that God will intervene in the agency of man.
Look around you and all that you see all that is happening is because of either the wise or unwise use of free will.
What else can I help you with?
Does a free press do more harm than good?
harm
What are the key differences between strict liability and negligence in terms of legal responsibility for harm caused?
Strict liability holds a person or entity responsible for harm caused regardless of fault, while negligence requires proving that the harm was caused by a failure to exercise reasonable care.
What is the difference between strict liability and negligence in terms of legal responsibility for harm caused?
Strict liability holds a person or entity responsible for harm caused regardless of fault, while negligence requires a showing of carelessness or failure to act reasonably in order to establish legal responsibility for harm caused.
What harm is caused if you swallow chloramphenicol?
i just did, and if i die tmr...
Can you sue for anything that has caused harm or damage to you?
No, you cannot sue for anything that has caused harm or damage to you. In order to sue someone, there must be a legal basis for the claim, such as negligence or intentional wrongdoing.
Is self harm caused by disfunctionalism?
No it is caused by low self esteem and it is most common in 13-18 year olds and especially in girls. 1 in every 200 girls self harm and 1 in every 4000 boys self harm.
Is a A principal is liable for any harm caused by his or her agent's tort?
true
Which disease is thought to have caused the most harm to the most people?
Milaria
Has facebook caused more harm than good to the society?
no not at all
What harm could a ball and chain may have caused?
many things
What is the difference between negligence per se and strict liability in terms of legal responsibility for harm caused by a product?
Negligence per se holds a party responsible for harm if they violate a law or regulation that is meant to prevent that harm. Strict liability holds a party responsible for harm caused by a product regardless of fault or intent.
Can pollution harm the world?
The world is pollution free.
