king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
Arthur was the son of Uther and Ygraine - but Ygraine was NOT Uther's wife when Arthur was conceived. Had Uther and Ygraine had other legitimately conceived children, Aurthr would have been .... "inconvenient", and a potential threat to Uther's other sons. For Arthur's own safety, Merlin took the infant Arthur away to be raised separately. One more point; there is only ONE KING AT A TIME. If Uther was King, then Arthur could not be - and Arthur could not be King while Uther lived.
King Arthur was king of Britain
king arthur was nice and overprotective
people said that he lived, & some people said he didn't. Married queen gwenivere.
Yes.
King Arthur is character of folklore. If he had lived, as supposed ruler of Britain he would have been Christian.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
name the famous city where king Arthur lived happy land
All accounts place most of Arthur's life and Arthur's death in the island of Great Britain. Of course the chronicles disagree on exactly where the battle between Arthur and Modret occurred, that battle after which Arthur soon vanished. The Prose Percevalhowever places that battle in Ireland, apparently from a mention in Wace that Modret was retreating towards Ireland.
Britain.
King Arthur is said to have lived in Camelot, a legendary city in Arthurian folklore. Camelot is often portrayed as a mythical and majestic place where King Arthur held court with his Knights of the Round Table.
king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
Yes he did. He had a stronghold in his house
The Knights of the Round Table were said to have lived in Camelot, a legendary castle and court associated with King Arthur. Camelot is believed to have been located in either Wales or southwest England, but its exact location remains a mystery.
Arthur is a LEGEND. He was not born, he is a story that grew. If there was a real Arthur, he lived some time between 400 and 800AD.
Camelot is the court of King Arthur..... It's mythical . Yes it was. King Arthur was real and camelot was real, but all of the supposed magical adventures of Arthur and the kingdom of camelot weren't.