answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Another answer from our community:

Traditional assumptions for camel domestication appears to be between 3000 and 2500 BC, in view of the biblical evidence.

Sandra L Olsen, PhD from the Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh states that although there is little detail available on the history of domestication, a ' likely origin for camel domestication is Iran or Turkmenistan, where their images turn up painted on pottery between 5000 and 4500 years ago and in ceramic wagon models dating between 4500 and 3600 years ago (Bulliet 1990). The latter, from Turkmenistan, implies that the animals were already used for draft by then and hence had probably been domesticated for some time.'

Source:'Nomadic Pastoralists, their Livestock, and their Landscape'

Domestication versus Widespread Use

The Camel and Bible Chronology

References to use of domesticated camels from the time of Abraham have been regarded by a number of authors such as T. E. Peet in Egypt and the Old Testament (1924) p.60, R. Pfeiffer, Introduction to the Old Testament (1941), p.154, and a number of others as anachronistic, that is, entirely out of place historically.

The idea that they are out of place seems a little difficult to sustain in the light of archaeological evidences such as camel statuettes, bones and other references to camels which begin to appear in the record around 3000 BC. (see J.P. Free, "Abraham's Camels," (July 1944:187-93.) The study conducted by Free related to the use of camels in Egypt. A large amount of evidence of the use of camels in the patriarchal period in both Syria and Mesopotamia have been discovered in recent times. K. A. Kitchen is one source of some of the details of this information (see Ancient Orient and Old Testament (1966), pp79-80; "Camel" Illustrated Bible Dictionary (1980), 1:228-230.

Source: The New Unger's Bible Dictionary, Merril F. Unger, 1985, p.67

The proposed date for camel domestication is thus hundreds of years before the time of Abraham (born c. 2161 BC).

How this relates to the Patriarchal narratives in which Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are all possessing camels is as follows. All three of these men are portrayed in The Bible as being of significant personal wealth and so the possession of camels is seen as being both linked to and a sign of both the wealth and the respect they enjoyed. Their possession of camels would have given these men an advantage in trade which others did not have.

Thus it is clear that the clear evidence of early camel domestication, when understood in the light of the Bible chronology, not only is totally in place but also explains the position of apparent respect held by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Research published in 2013 by two archaeologists at Tel Aviv University provides the definitive answer that camels were not domesticated in the eastern Mediterranean until 930-900 BCE, long after the time attributed to Abraham. The camels appear suddenly, following major changes in copper production throughout the region. This period coincides with the invasion of Egyptian king Sheshonq I - known in the Bible as Shishak - in 925 BCE. Zooarchaeological studies, artistic depictions and textual evidence all point to this period as the introduction of domestic camels.

The identification and dating of earlier camel figurines and drawings is debatable, and at most represent the acquaintance of ancient people with wild camels. Thus, it cannot be concluded, based on early artefacts and drawings, that camels were exploited as pack animals prior to the Iron Age.
Genesis 37:25 seems to make an unlikely reference to Ishmaelites taking camels from Canaan (Palestine) down into Egypt - such a valuable pack animal would certainly have been adopted by the Egyptians. However, ancient Egyptians did not have or even know about camels until they were reintroduced by Persian conquerors in 525 BCE (Camels had once been indigenous to Egypt but had become extinct, perhaps due to hunting for food). Since the Egyptians were the undisputed colonial masters of Palestine until 1200 BCE, and were involved in Palestine at various times through the first millennium BCE, we can confidently say that domesticated camels had not been introduced into Palestine until the first millennium BCE.

Exodus 9:3 seems to be anachronistic, since the Lord spoke of camels as among the prized herds of the Egyptians, along with cattle, horses, donkeys and sheep.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When was the Camel domesticated and does it agree with the chronology of the Bible?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How does your story agree with the bible record?

yes it does


Do you agree that the bible is the religious matter?

No in my opinion its not


How does the Chinese story agree with the bible record?

.


Ask me a question :)?

how did the ptolemaic model supposedly agree with the bible


What view of life is consistent with the bible and observations?

Science and The Bible don't have the same viewpoints on life. Science deals with what can be explained and the Bible deals with faith. There will be other viewpoints to follow this as we do not agree.


Is the Bible the cause of the divisions within the church?

No the Bible is a book. It's the people all over this earth that are different. As many Christians there is in this world it would be very strange if all of them could agree on everything in the Bible.


How Cannonisation of the bible was done?

There was a "committee" that met and examined the books. The books had to meet certain criteria, such as have verified authorship, had to be accepted by the churches, had to agree with other books of the Bible.


Must the facts about science agree with the Bible?

There is no real requirement for science to agree with the words of the Bible, or even for the Bible to literally agree with modern science. Stephen Jay Gould explained this when he said that the domain or magisterium for science is the empirical realm - what the universe is made from and why it works the way it does. The magisterium of religion includes the ultimate meaning and moral values. These magisteria are nonoverlapping - science does not comment on the ultimate meaning of life, while religion should not comment on the natural world.At times the Bible does disagree with the facts of science, which makes Stephen Jay Goud's recommendation more significant for Christians. For more information on this, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/when-science-challenges-the-bible


Why did Thomas Jefferson not agree with many of John Adam's beliefs?

Because Adams tore out parts of the bible he thought were useless.


What did Martin Luther find when he studied the Bible?

Martin Luther main discovery when studying the Bible was that he didn't agree with it, thus he spent most of his time mutilating the Bible by throwing out books which he didn't agree with (all of the Deuterocanon from the Old Testament, and a good bit of the deuterocanon from the New Testament. Those books that he didn't throw out, like St. Paul's letters, he altered so that they would agree with his religion. For a complete discussion of the many changes that Martin Luther made to the Bible, and the mistranslations that he made of it, please read The Facts About Luther by Msgr. Patrick F. O'Hare, LL.D. and for a complete discussion of the Bible and the story of the lost books of the protestant Bible, please read Why Catholic Bibles are Bigger by Gary G. Michuta, links below.


Does the name Peninnah come up anywhere else in the Bible?

peninnah dosent appear anywhere else in the bible and i only know this cuz im peninnah yeah! such a pretty name comments if you agree :)


Which religion believes this Virtually all branches agree to acts such as prayer Bible-reading and attempting to live a moral lifestyle obedience to the Ten Commandments and love for neighbors?

Christianity and Judaism. For Christianity "The Bible" is the two Testaments; while Judaism calls the Tanakh "The Bible."