Restrictions upon freedom of worship should be applied when the form of worship begins infringing upon freedoms of others. I am not speaking of when you are saying something, and I don't like what you are saying. I am not even speaking of being rude with your religion. In either situation, you often have the freedom to, quite frankly, suck it up. But, for example, the radical Muslim actions of 9/11 was obviously off-limits. Anything that violates laws or infringes upon freedom of others should not be tolerated.
You may worship whatever you want, whenever you want, in whatever manner you want, so long as your worship practices do not interfere with the rights of others as defined by laws. As Thomas Jefferson said, "I care not how my neighbor worships, for it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."
There are limits for freedom of speech as well as freedom of expression. These limits on freedom of expression are referred to as time, place, and manner restrictions. Therefore a law stating any one individual or organization can only contribute so much would still allow one to contribute but place an amount on it therefore it would not violate the freedom of expression but rather place a focus point on it.
Jesus did not go anywhere special to worship God. In fact he gave us a guide to worship God in the proper manner: But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. (John 4.23)
Muslims do not take any aid in worship. All the worship must be done by the person himself and exactly in the manner as laid down in the books. The most prominent form of worship is the daily prayer which is offered five times a day.
Most would worship in a manner in which they are accustomed to worshiping. Some may do so as dictated by the feelings they hold in their hearts, or it might be a simple Thank You Lord.
Jat Sikhs do not want Dalits to pray in the manner in which they like. Shooting two Dalit Sikh leaders in Vienna cast its shadow in Punjab and Haryana. Jat Sikha should respect others freedom. Indian government should exercise caution.
Limitations to the freedom of petition often include restrictions based on time, place, and manner, which can regulate when and where individuals can gather to present their petitions. Additionally, laws may prohibit petitions that incite violence, hate speech, or other unlawful activities. Governments may also impose requirements for permits or registration, which can create barriers to exercising this right. Ultimately, while the freedom to petition is protected, it is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable regulations.
Nothing replaced the mass as it was and always will be the central manner of worship of the Catholic Church.
The U.S. government can constitutionally limit a group's right to freedom of assembly when the assembly poses a clear and present danger to public safety or order, such as inciting violence, causing significant disruption, or violating laws related to time, place, and manner restrictions. Additionally, limitations may be justified if the assembly infringes on the rights of others or if there are compelling governmental interests, such as protecting national security. Any restrictions must be narrowly tailored and not overly broad.
Government must be content neutral, or based on time, manner and place NOT based on the topic being discussed.
The act, manner, or power of flying. It can also signify freedom and breaking from bad things.