answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When would you carry out the calibration procedures for the experiment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What kind of data would you need to carry out a scientific experiment?

depends on the experiment - more information required


Who approves and carry out laws passed by legislative?

Different countries have different procedures, it would depend on which country you mean


How would you find the mass of an object using the experiment already carried out?

I would first inform myself exhaustively regarding the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the experiment already carried out. Only then would I be in a position to plan a method of procedure in which they would be useful. This, I'm sure, was kind of the thinking of the people who designed and carried out the previous experiment ... the one already carried out.


What are the examples of randomization?

sampling variability and improper calibration of an instrument. --Actually, improper calibration of an instrument would be a systematic error, as it would always be in the same direction and by the same amount. --Random errors are unknown, unpredictable changes in the instruments or the environment. For example, the temperature of the room changed, or the doors of a balance were left open. --Random errors are things that can be corrected for (mostly) by repeating the experiment or averaging the current results.


Why would a company outsource its calibration services?

A company would outsource its calibration services in order to reduce costs of employment. While the calibration services are a very important part of the business, if the outsourced section can provide similar quality then the decision of outsourcing proves to be successful.


What are examples of random errors?

sampling variability and improper calibration of an instrument. --Actually, improper calibration of an instrument would be a systematic error, as it would always be in the same direction and by the same amount. --Random errors are unknown, unpredictable changes in the instruments or the environment. For example, the temperature of the room changed, or the doors of a balance were left open. --Random errors are things that can be corrected for (mostly) by repeating the experiment or averaging the current results.


What are the examples of random error?

sampling variability and improper calibration of an instrument. --Actually, improper calibration of an instrument would be a systematic error, as it would always be in the same direction and by the same amount. --Random errors are unknown, unpredictable changes in the instruments or the environment. For example, the temperature of the room changed, or the doors of a balance were left open. --Random errors are things that can be corrected for (mostly) by repeating the experiment or averaging the current results.


If all the SCN were not converted completely to FeNCS when the calibration curve was prepared would this raise or lower the value of Keq?

Sorry, since it is unknown of what experiment or laboratory analysis you're talking about, this question is unanswerable. It also is not accurate enough: FeNCS is not a good formula, SCN is an anion: SCN- and the sentence:".... when the calibration curve was prepared(??) would this raise or lower the value of Keq" is difficult to interprete as such a curve is not adequately described.


What is everything you would need to put together a science project?

You need a question. You need to make a hypothesis based on this question. You need to design an experiment to confirm or deny the hypothesis. You need a list of procedures to carry out the hypothesis. You need a list of your tools and materials used in the procedure. You need to know how to interpret your results. You need to publish them with a discussion about where errors occured and how to improve upon the experiment. Wash, rinse, repeat.


Suppose the thermometer is miscalibrated to read 0.3C higher Does this error in calibration result in the molar mass of the vapor in the flask being reported as too high or too low or as unaffected?

Because the temp was .3º C off in the beginning and in the end of the experiment, the results would be unchanged since it was constant threw the whole experiment.


What is the best free calibration software?

It is suggested that reputable and great free calibration software would be through "Monitor Calibration Wizard". This is a computer download program that helps you get proper color on your display screen, if you cannot do so manually.


What calibration service would you recommend in Dallas, TX?

There are a mere handful of calibration services in Dallas. The best appears to be Aldinger. You can find out more at http://www.aldingercompany.com/.