Want this question answered?
It would be pointless doing the experiment and not measuring accurately
If there is a factor that confuses the result of an experiment, I would call that a design flaw in the experiment. It might also be an uncontrolled variable.
Because the measurement usually requires putting the measurement device in the experiment. Just observing an experiment effects it because you are interpreting the results.
If you are discussing in terms of classifying various gases, and by air you mean oxygen. The experiment you would use is a glowing split test.
Well in the case that it does have a variable, even just one, it would still be a variable experiment because that one part of the experiment may still cause a different effect/result when changed!!!
depends on the experiment - more information required
Different countries have different procedures, it would depend on which country you mean
I would first inform myself exhaustively regarding the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the experiment already carried out. Only then would I be in a position to plan a method of procedure in which they would be useful. This, I'm sure, was kind of the thinking of the people who designed and carried out the previous experiment ... the one already carried out.
sampling variability and improper calibration of an instrument. --Actually, improper calibration of an instrument would be a systematic error, as it would always be in the same direction and by the same amount. --Random errors are unknown, unpredictable changes in the instruments or the environment. For example, the temperature of the room changed, or the doors of a balance were left open. --Random errors are things that can be corrected for (mostly) by repeating the experiment or averaging the current results.
A company would outsource its calibration services in order to reduce costs of employment. While the calibration services are a very important part of the business, if the outsourced section can provide similar quality then the decision of outsourcing proves to be successful.
sampling variability and improper calibration of an instrument. --Actually, improper calibration of an instrument would be a systematic error, as it would always be in the same direction and by the same amount. --Random errors are unknown, unpredictable changes in the instruments or the environment. For example, the temperature of the room changed, or the doors of a balance were left open. --Random errors are things that can be corrected for (mostly) by repeating the experiment or averaging the current results.
sampling variability and improper calibration of an instrument. --Actually, improper calibration of an instrument would be a systematic error, as it would always be in the same direction and by the same amount. --Random errors are unknown, unpredictable changes in the instruments or the environment. For example, the temperature of the room changed, or the doors of a balance were left open. --Random errors are things that can be corrected for (mostly) by repeating the experiment or averaging the current results.
Sorry, since it is unknown of what experiment or laboratory analysis you're talking about, this question is unanswerable. It also is not accurate enough: FeNCS is not a good formula, SCN is an anion: SCN- and the sentence:".... when the calibration curve was prepared(??) would this raise or lower the value of Keq" is difficult to interprete as such a curve is not adequately described.
You need a question. You need to make a hypothesis based on this question. You need to design an experiment to confirm or deny the hypothesis. You need a list of procedures to carry out the hypothesis. You need a list of your tools and materials used in the procedure. You need to know how to interpret your results. You need to publish them with a discussion about where errors occured and how to improve upon the experiment. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Because the temp was .3º C off in the beginning and in the end of the experiment, the results would be unchanged since it was constant threw the whole experiment.
It is suggested that reputable and great free calibration software would be through "Monitor Calibration Wizard". This is a computer download program that helps you get proper color on your display screen, if you cannot do so manually.
There are a mere handful of calibration services in Dallas. The best appears to be Aldinger. You can find out more at http://www.aldingercompany.com/.