A dry mount specimen is a simple sample where the specimen is just placed on the slide without any solutions. This usually works best for items like hair, dust, and feathers. It may or may not need a cover slip placed over it.
it is often harder got get inside and more painful for the recieving party. however, dry mounting allows you to avoid the warm up phase. for this reason dry mounting is used when the two subjects are low on time or in an awkward place i.e public (see voyeurism)
when you would want to see a non living organism than you use dry mount and when you want to see a living organism you use a wet mount
Yes - but a specimen can be something that is not observed under a microscope as well. For example, if you ever went on a walk in the country, picked a wildflower that grew there, and brought it home, you would have a specimen of a native plant that grew in the area where you found it.
An oak leaf would not make a good specimen for a wet mount because it contains a lot of water. The leaf is best observed under a dry mount.
That would be an electron microscope.
light microscope, because the specimen is alive
If they were not dried well then any water on the specimen could refract or reflect the light coming at it...and so distorted images would be the result.
the specimen is the objective the microscope and a parts of microscope
Yes - but a specimen can be something that is not observed under a microscope as well. For example, if you ever went on a walk in the country, picked a wildflower that grew there, and brought it home, you would have a specimen of a native plant that grew in the area where you found it.
Yes - but a specimen can be something that is not observed under a microscope as well. For example, if you ever went on a walk in the country, picked a wildflower that grew there, and brought it home, you would have a specimen of a native plant that grew in the area where you found it.
The primary lens is to close to the specimen
An oak leaf would not make a good specimen for a wet mount because it contains a lot of water. The leaf is best observed under a dry mount.
That would be an electron microscope.
So far as I know, this would be called an electron microscope.
light microscope, because the specimen is alive
a TEM microscope privides an detailed image of the inside of a specimen a SEM microscope provides a 3D image of a specimen take for exampel a sperm in a TEM microscope you would see the inner stucture of the sperm in a SEM microscope you would se in detail the exact form shape of the sperm
Kohler Illumination is extremely important when observing a specimen under a microscope. Without Kohler Illumination, it would be nearly impossible to achieve a high-quality image of the specimen, and therefore scientists would be unable to study and observe a multitude of living things in a beneficial way.
If they were not dried well then any water on the specimen could refract or reflect the light coming at it...and so distorted images would be the result.
The maximum magnification of a light microscope is 2000x. Anything requiring more than 2000x magnification requires an electron microscope.