Humankind is the perfect example.
We have shown with fossils that there are numerous transitional forms, from apelike predecessors, to simple hominins to hominids, to more recent ancestors to the modern homo sapiens.
We have shown via genetic, physiological and anatomic comparisons that humans are closely related to certain apes, then somewhat less closely related to other primates, then less closely again to certain groups of mammals, and then less closely again to the rets of mammals.
99.9% of all scientists accept evolutionary theory. A great majority of biologists, at least, find it useful.
2 examples of convergent evolution among caminacules
Proteins reflect DNA sequences, so scientists study proteins to look for genetic similarities and differences in organisms.
Scientists test ideas about chemical evolution by using computer models.
The vast majority of scientists support evolution. There is no longer any debate in the scientific community about whether evolution occurs, only the mechanisms in which evolution acts upon is debated.
The overwhelming majority of scientists accept the theory of evolution by natural selection. Any scientists that do not accept the theory usually do so for religious reasons.
By using monkeys, scientists can find out more about primates and the evolution of humans (cause monkeys are related to humans).
Biologists.
It gives them something to study.
Evolution
example of an micro-evolution in an organism?
scientists study a lot about evolution. its a difficult job to do so they divide it to several types and study it individually. though several years of reserch they revealed a tons of detail about genes... hereditary dieseases . the do find out that some dieseases is transferred from a persona from their ancesters