Where did chocolet come from?
Chocolate was native to the Americas and existed as far back as the Aztec civilization. Chocolate was originally served as a liquid that was bitter.
1 person found this useful
The correct phrase is "comme ci, comme Ã§a" and is pronounced roughly, "kumm see, kumm sah". All it means is "Like this, like that". It is a French way of saying "so-so". This is a simple example of why it's important to read a lot and take some courses in foreign languages, even in today's ele…ctronic English-speaking world. D'accord? (French for "You agree?") It has also the colloquial use of 'more or less' ( Full Answer )
Answer . THEY is a specil type of mythical beast. Answer . THEY is a specil type of mythical beast There are many places in which cars and vehicles could come fromsuch as the United States. Cars can also come from Japan and Italy.
" "How come?" is actually a very interesting phrase. It seems to have been an American invention of the 19th century, although similar forms date back several hundred years in English. The first appearance of "how come" in print dates to 1848, but since that was in Bartlett's Dictionary of Americani…sms and the phrase was described as being common at that time, it is almost certainly older. That was, after all, an age when slang and colloquial phrases were usually avoided, not memorialized, in print. The basic sense of the verb "come" is, of course, " to move towards, approach" or " to arrive." One of the specialized, and now archaic, meanings of "come" is " to happen," as in the phrase " to come to pass," reflecting the idea of a condition, time or event "arriving" (also found in such uses as "Come next summer, Dwayne Junior had better have a job"). "How" used as an adverb modifying a verb (such as "come"), means basically " by what means?" or "for what reason?" The final piece of the puzzle of "how come" is the fact that it is actually an abbreviation of a longer phrase, which, although not known with certainty, was probably "how comes it" or "how does it come", meaning "how did this (event, condition, etc.) happen to be this way." Finally, "How come?" is, as you note, essentially synonymous with "why?", but in popular usage it often serves a slightly different function. "How come?" carries a challenging, more emphatic tone than a simple "why?" would convey ("How come Jimmy never has to wash the dishes?"). Unlike "why," "how come" strongly suggests that the questioner has already developed an opinion on the situation and has decided that something is not proper or fair. " ( Full Answer )
Chocolate chip seems to be a best seller. Although some people can't have Chocolate or don't like it. That is kind of a hard question because all diffrent people like diffrent kinds of cookies. Hope this helps! ;)
\nThe switch gets activated and it turns on! Is something wrong with your? Does it come on when it shouldnt? Does it not work and you are wondering why? Help me give you a better answer.
Yes it really does you put the chocolate on the cows tongue and then shake the cows hoof, then WA la you have chocolate utters!? no i am just kidding don't you ever read the ingredients it says artificial flavoring and coloring.
I can't come get you, because I don't know who or where you are. But if you aren't safe where you are, please talk to an adult you trust about it, so that we can make sure you are safe. Okay?
for one thing who doesnt like chocolate that's not alergic to it so most likely yes they do btw u spelled chocolate wrong.
The Redcoats are the British. By the way, Paul Revere shouted the British are coming.
I'm pretty sure its B in the english alphabet, it might vary in other languages.
As soon as I can get the time off from work. But I need to know your location in order to get there. How long can I stay?
animals were made by god who made the earth and us and is all powerful
You are yourself because God made you, of course. --- Each person is a unique individual, even someone who is a twin or triplet.
Both forms are correct, but the first is better. It uses natural English grammar, while the second uses stilted Frenchified grammar. The mistaken notion that an English sentence should not end with a preposition comes from the study of Latin, which at one time was considered somehow more "correct" t…han English. ( Full Answer )
Yes but it really isn't good for them. Dont give them Garlic or onion either, it will kill them.
The can can started in around 1830, in working-class ballrooms in Paris. It was first performed in the 19th century, and is now considered an acceptable part of world culture.
Of course, any relationship can come to "this", although "this" is often undefined except by the person asking, "Can it come to this?" And of course, the person asking wouldn't phrase it as, "Can it come to that" because the situation is in the present and so, "this" is typically used.
December 2000. Scanning electron micrograph of Escherichia coli bacteria. Source: Rocky Mountain Laboratories, NIAID, NIH. For as long as we have known about them, scientists have thought that simple bacteria were the link to the earliest life forms on earth. However, growing evidence suggests we'…ve got it all back to front -- could the secrets of the origin of life be lurking inside us?. Scientists used to think that life evolved from the simple bacteria.. When most of us think about evolution, we tend to think in terms of simple organisms evolving into more complex ones. Simple chemical reactions evolved into simple cells, which later evolved into more complex organisms, and so on all the way up to humans. It's no longer believed that humans are at the top of the evolutionary ladder, but evolution does tend to drive organisms towards greater complexity, does it not?. Human cells tell more about evolution than bacteria.. However, this is not always so. Rather, those organisms that leave the most offspring behind, simple or complex, do best. Greater complexity is sometimes a consequence of evolution, but simplification can also be a winning strategy -- it all depends on the environment. Nevertheless, most scientists hold that the first organisms on Earth were much like bacteria of today. But several features of the biochemistry of life suggest that bacteria aren't so ancient after all. In fact, in some respects, the cells of our own bodies tell us more about the evolution of life than bacteria do. The key is in the discovery that won Sidney Altman and Tom Cech the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1989.. The chicken and the egg . DNA can reveal evolutionary history, i.e., the story of life.. In modern organisms, genetic information is stored on DNA (deoxyribose nucleic acid) in units called genes. . Genes code for proteins, which are responsible for the various activities that make a cell function. . Some proteins, called enzymes, perform the chemical reactions that run the cell. One group of enzymes, the DNA polymerases, make DNA. . The information for making those enzymes is stored in the DNA as a gene. . Therefore, finding the evolutionary origin of proteins and DNA is tricky as each requires the other for its own synthesis-which came first? That's where Cech and Altman come in. They studied RNA (ribose nucleic acid), a close chemical relative of DNA:. Some scientists believe that RNA, not proteins or DNA, acted as starting material for life.. When proteins are made from the information in DNA, a working RNA copy of the gene is made for use by ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell. Therefore RNA, like DNA, stores genetic information, and, like proteins, it also performs chemical reactions. . Bringing RNA into the picture solves the chicken and egg problem. RNA can be both chicken and egg. . What this means to evolutionary biologists is that life could well have BEGUN with organisms made largely of RNA. . This idea of an 'RNA world' has been debated since the 1960's, but Cech and Altman's discovery has convinced most scientists that it is at least possible. . It is now known that RNA is at the heart of many of the basic functions in the cell, and probably evolved in the RNA world. . Jack-of-all-trades . But if RNA is so versatile, what happened to the 'RNA world'? As the saying goes, "Jack-of-all-trades, master of none;" RNA is not as good at performing chemical reactions as proteins, nor is it as good at storing genetic information as DNA. It's not surprising that since the RNA world, proteins have gradually replaced most RNA enzymes, and DNA now stores the genetic information.. Can modern cells tell us which came first -- proteins, RNA, or DNA?. Most researchers agree that RNA used to have more of a central role because it solved the chicken-and-egg problem of which came first in evolution- proteins or DNA. But other than being a tidy piece of logic, is there any substance to the hypothesis? Since we can't travel back in time, it is impossible to prove the existence of the RNA world outright, but we can do the next best thing-rebuild it from the 'molecular fossils' that have remained in modern cells.. Looking for 'molecular fossils' . By delving into our RNA-rich past, we can get an idea of what early life looked like, and this may in turn help us understand how life evolved into the many forms we see today. 'Digging' for molecular fossils is not a trivial exercise. Not all RNAs are going to be genuine RNA world fossils, but it is possible to establish which are likely to be ancient, and which are more recent additions.. RNA in ribosomes may provide clues to cellular origins.. One of the most central machines in the cell is the ribosome, which translates the genetic code stored in DNA into the language of proteins. . The core of the ribosome is made from RNA, with proteins providing a scaffold to hold the RNA in place. Even with most of the protein stripped away, it can still make proteins. . The finding that the RNA core is the engine room of the protein synthesis factory is a strong argument that protein synthesis was invented in the RNA world. . Indeed, the ribosome is just one of many RNA machines, giving scientists a surprisingly clear picture of early life. The picture appears most complete in the eukaryotes (plants, animals, fungi, amoebae), which are more reliant on RNA than prokaryotes (bacteria and related cells), the former retaining more clues to our RNA-rich past. Since RNA is a Jack-of-all-trades we would expect it to be gradually replaced during evolution.. Simple organisms may be more evolved than complex ones.. The common view of the evolution of eukaryotes and prokaryotes from an ancient 'last universal common ancestor' (the LUCA), is that a prokaryote-like creature was the first to arise, and that an ancient eukaryotes arose from some prokaryote:. RNA world â LUCA â prokaryote-like organism â eukaryote-like organism. Since many more ancient RNA world fossils are found in eukaryotes, the graph makes more sense this way, with a gradual loss of RNA:. RNA world â LUCA â eukaryote-like organism â prokaryote-like organism. Backing up the hard drive . In addition to the information we can glean from the study of RNA, we can also learn about our evolutionary past by examining how the storage of genetic information has evolved. Genetic information is like any other information; it is stored in a particular medium, it gets copied, read and transmitted, and over time, small errors can turn up.. Cells without nuclei (prokaryotes) store genetic information differently than cells with nuclei (eukaryotes).. Prokaryotes and eukaryotes employ quite different mechanisms for ensuring that genetic information is not corrupted. The differences are as follows:. Prokaryotes maintain their genome in a single copy, usually a single DNA chromosome, with as much information packed onto it as possible. . Many eukaryotes have two copies, divide the information up into several DNA chromosomes, with the genes packed relatively sparsely. Unlike prokaryotes, eukaryotes keep backup copies. . Having only one copy of a gene means that if an error is made, that damage is permanent-there is no backup copy for its rescue. . But what difference does it make if the genes are split up or kept on a single chromosome? Consider this example:. Without a backup for genetic data, errors in the genome become permanent.. Genome 1 has two genes, A and B. These are housed on a single chromosome, and there are two copies of that chromosome. In one copy, gene A gets damaged and in the other, gene B gets damaged. The organism can still survive because it still has one working copy of gene A and one working copy of gene B. However, it has to carry the damaged copies also, because these are physically linked (on the same chromosome) to the working copies. . Genome 2 also has two genes, A and B. However, each gene is housed on its own chromosome, and again there are two copies of each chromosome. Again, one copy of gene A gets damaged, and one copy of gene B gets damaged. However, genome 2 can discard the damaged copies of genes A and B without losing the working copies, as each gene has its own chromosome. . Genome 'architecture' gives us a clue as to the informational stresses on a genome: the more genes that are kept together on a single chromosome, the greater the accuracy required to maintain them.. In early genetic systems, the strategy described for genome 2 was probably used because damage was frequent, and this provided a good way of discarding damaged genes while keeping the undamaged copies. . The more copies of a genome and the fewer genes per chromosome, the better this would work. . Prokaryotes are considered risk takers because they lack the safety nets of eukaryotes.. Prokaryotes appear to use none of these safety nets, so can be considered risk takers. . Prokaryote genomes thus look like a recent invention-organisms could only afford to keep one copy of their information on a single chromosome if they were pretty sure they would not lose it. . Early life forms were not good at storing information, especially since they had RNA as a genetic material. They needed to develop as many little tricks as possible to minimize mutation; genomes like those in prokaryotes would have been disastrous! . Perhaps eukaryotes (for example, plants & animals) never lost many of these ancient traits left over from a period where copying was poorer, so their genomes can be considered fossils of this earlier period in the evolution of life. . Interestingly, many single-celled eukaryotes maintain their DNA as a single copy. It is therefore hard to know if ancestral eukaryotes maintained one or more copies of their genome. . Keeping back-up copies was nevertheless an essential trait in very early genetic systems. . The tortoise & the hare . Looking at both the RNA relics in eukaryotes and their genome design, it appears eukaryotes have maintained the status quo, retaining many molecular fossils, while prokaryotes have lost many of these. How might this have happened? It could well be due to 'lifestyle' -- the ways in which organisms go about their daily business:. Some organisms (e.g., oak trees) are slow growing and rely on a stable supply of nutrients, making their populations fairly stable also. . Other organisms (e.g., locusts) grow very fast and compete for nutrients that are extremely variable in supply. When a nutrient is available, it is crucial to grow and reproduce as fast as possible. When the food supply runs low, the populations suffer large crashes and only a few make it to the next nutrient source. . Ability to adapt to environmental changes enhances an organism's chance of survival.. For some organisms, speed is everything -- the ability to react quickly to the presence of a new food source is all-important. This means that if one organism is faster to respond than the rest, it will profit at the expense of its competitors. Thinking back to the ancient RNA machinery, there would have been strong selection in organisms to replace inefficient RNA machinery with faster protein machinery.. In modern organisms, eukaryotes as a group fit into the 'Tortoise' group, while the prokaryotes take the fast 'hare' track, but within these, there is also a spectrum-brewer's yeast has a 'bacterial lifestyle' when compared to oak trees for example. However, even fast-growing eukaryotes have a lot of slow RNA machinery, so this argument alone may not explain how prokaryotes arose. If a fast lifestyle alone doesn't shed RNA, then how do we explain the lack of RNA in prokaryotes?. Shedding the excess in life's sauna . The evolutionary 'push' that gave rise to the prokaryotes may well have been an adaptation to living at high temperatures. Patrick Forterre, at the University of Paris SÃ»d has put forth a hypothesis which he calls the 'thermoreduction hypothesis.' He maintains that prokaryotes arose from a eukaryote-like ancestor by adaptation to life at high temperatures, and in the process shed many of their ancient features. Forterre's work suggests that even the bacteria now living at moderate temperatures retain traces of their hot history.. Forterre's argument rests on the observation that RNA is very unstable at high temperatures:. Some prokaryotes have adapted to life at extreme temperatures, such as deep sea vents.. Organisms living at high temperatures should make limited use of RNA. . In prokaryotes, many RNA fossils appear to have been replaced. . Numerous prokaryotes live in the scalding hot temperatures typical of hot springs and deep sea thermal vents, which often exceed 100Â°C! . In eukaryotes, many RNAs are still in use. . Currently there are no known examples of eukaryotes living at extreme temperatures. If any are found, we would expect them to have lost a lot of their RNA. . Prokaryotes can survive in higher temperatures because, unlike eukaryotes, their DNA is in a protective circular configuration.. Another piece of evidence for thermoreduction comes from the genomes of prokaryotes:. In eukaryotes, chromosomes are made of linear DNA. . In prokaryotes the genome is made of circular DNA. . Circular DNA is much less vulnerable to heat damage than linear DNA, which starts to get 'split ends' at high temperatures. . Circular chromosomes are conspicuously absent from eukaryotes and their widespread incidence in prokaryotes alone is best explained by the thermoreduction hypothesis. . For eukaryotes to maintain linear DNA genomes, they require a special system for maintaining their ends:. An enzyme called telomerase, which has both a protein and an RNA component, does this job. . Telomerase is common to all eukaryotes, suggesting it is very ancient. . It seems unlikely that eukaryotes with their linear genomes, and many RNAs, including telomerase, could have emerged from the 'sauna' of life. . It is more likely that the organisms which first braved high temperatures shed much of the evidence of their RNA world ancestry along the way, as well as linear DNA genomes and telomerase. . Modern prokaryotes appear to have a 'hot history,' even though many now live at moderate or even cold temperatures. . Clues to the origin of life in your own body . Evolutionary biologists have traditionally studied the simplest organisms they can find in order to learn more about the origins of life. But simple doesn't necessarily mean ancient, so we should not restrict our search purely to simple organisms. All organisms have been evolving for 3.5 billion years or so, and the idea that there is some obscure bug that time forgot which resembles ancient life on Earth is outdated.. Human cells, which are eukaryotic, may harbor secrets to the origin of life.. As Forterre's work shows, simplification has its merits, and it seems that bacteria have lost a lot of the molecular fossils of our ancient past. We know an enormous amount about the biochemistry of our own cells, and although there's layer upon layer of complexity, hidden underneath it all are clues to the origins of the earliest cells. How ironic it is that human cells harbor as many if not more secrets of the origins of life than the simple bacteria! It's no wonder that evolutionary biologists are as excited about the Human Genome Project as anyone else!. The cell's nucleus may be a more ancient development than first thought.. It is important to keep in mind that eukaryotic cells have continued to evolve over time. While it is possible to uncover much about the RNA world, and how prokaryotes and eukaryotes evolved by looking at 'molecular fossils', most features of the eukaryotic cell are 'recent' innovations. For instance, mitochondria (the power plant of the eukaryotic cell) and chloroplasts (the organelle which sunlight turns into sugar in plants) are the remnants of ancient prokaryotes that were engulfed by ancient eukaryotes. Another major innovation is the evolution of multicellular organisms. This brought with it the fruits of division of labor, allowing the evolution of complex organs and tissues.. Conclusion: Molecular fossils may change some scientific views about the origins and evolution of life.. Most researchers would add the nucleus to the list of 'new' eukaryotic features, but its interesting to note that all RNA world fossils are found in the nucleus. The assumption that the nucleus is recent is based on the argument that evolution drives towards complexity, but we know this isn't always so. It is exciting to consider the possibility that the nucleus is old, and prokaryotes have lost it.. Once upon a time, we'd probably have been in danger of being burnt at the stake for such heretical stuff, but nowadays biologists no longer view the evolution of life as a progression from simple to complex with humans as the pinnacle of evolutionary achievement. Here's to your molecular fossils! ( Full Answer )
There Mothers Answer . They are come from nowhere and strive to go somewhere. This is known as the meaning of life--
Many products and foods are packaged into cans or tins. Here is a list of some canned items: . Foods, including sardines, tuna, ham, spam, coffee, nuts, spices, most vegetables, some fruits, some snack foods, and many microwavable foods. . Drinks, including soda pop and juices. . Snuff is in a c…an, or a can with a heavy cardboard lid. . Some pop-up toys. . Paints, varnishes, and other woodworking or home improvement products. Gasoline can be purchased in can-like plastic containers. ( Full Answer )
The earliest record of the word bubble in the English language dates back to 1398, from Middle English bubbelen (verb) 'to bubble'.. Earler, in 1350-1400 we see the form bobel (noun), which may have come from Middle Dutch bobbel (noun) or from Middle Late German: bubbeln (verb), bubbele (…noun).. All of these words may have originated from the oral/verbal representation of the natural sound of something that bubbles. For more information, see Related links below. ( Full Answer )
yes very much so. dogs are not allowed to have sugar. it increases their chances of heart worms
When male ejaculation takes place within the vagina, a certain amount of sperm will enter the Fallopian tubes in the natural event of fertilization. The rest will flow from the vagina.
A song that has repetitions of "come on, come on" throughout the lyrics would be the Beatles "Everybody's got something to hide except for me and my monkey" from the 1968 white album, The Beatles. I think what you mean is from elivs Presley i don't know the title though i think it was somethi…ng with LITTLE Wasn't that the Robbie Williams one? When he was dressed up like Kiss and he was like "Let me entertain you..."? Im thinking Tender by Blur I think the beatles twist and shout: come on come come on baby now, twist and shout I'm thinking 'A little less conversation' by Elvis Presley It also might be "Please Please Me" by The Beatles The lyrics you might be thinking of are "Come on (Come on), Come on (Come on), Come on (Come on), Come on (Come on), Please please me, Oh yeah, Like I please you Are you thinking of come on, come on, come on, come on little darlin'...? If so, that's a song by Ritchie Valens- Come On, Let's Go ( Full Answer )
It means that the truth will eventually come out. You don't have to try to force the issue trying to find the truth. It always prevails.
Alright, first of all it is you are all coming. This is because it has to be in a subject verb agreement. Think of it this way, and it helps everyone Take away one or two words and see which ones make more sense You all are coming All are coming X You are all coming Are all coming (Chec…k mark) So it is you are all coming. Glad could help! ( Full Answer )
its called the ps3 move (i may be mistaken with xbox but i dount it) its like the wii only with to great big glowing balls at the end it should be out soon people have played demos also Nintendo is coming out with the 3ds Sony also just unveiled the NGP (Next Generation Portable) which is t…he successer to the PSP ( Full Answer )
The informal expression "How come" meaning "Why?" is of Yiddish origin. It is related to the formal, rather prosecutorial phrase "how comes it that..." They would be likely to occur together only in court-room dialogue.
It differs depending on how much you bleed but yes, when there's a lot you can feel it getting warm.
If you meant the poem that opens with the words The time has come,--then the answer is Alice in Wonderland--The time has come, the walrus said, to talk of many things. Of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings.
This answer is not intended to scare, but rather to educate, so I'll begin by letting you know that you probably won't become pregnant from any single act of coitus. Of course, all pregnancies began with a single act of coitus, but it generally takes many tries. What you have described is a physic…al impossibility unless you were wearing a female condom; there most certainly are millions of sperm remaining within the vaginal canal, even if it appears as though all of it came out. There is virtually the same probability of becoming pregnant as if all the sperm had remained inside. Furthermore, even pre-ejaculate fluids can cause pregnancy, so the chance of pregnancy had already occurred long (or not so long) before he came. That said, some fertile couples try for years, having unprotected sex hundreds of times before a successful pregnancy, just as some women become pregnant the first time they have sex. If the thought is causing you any anxiety, pregnancy tests are more than worth the money. Yes you can. It's the semen, the transporter fluid that comes out because it has nowhere else to go. The sperms are swimming towards the uterus. It's always like this unless he wears a condom. ( Full Answer )
Your period doesn't come 'whenever' - when your period is duedepends on your menstrual cycle, typically this is 28 days but itcan differ from person to person and irregular cycles can be normalduring your teens.
It appears that both of your options are exactly the same, soeither (or both!) are correct.
Come is the first and second person present tense of the verb to come . Comes is the third person singular present tense of the verb to come . Examples would be: I come to give you warning. You come and go when you like. He comes to carry you away. We come to sing Caesar's praises. They come …to have a good time.. ( Full Answer )
I USE to take out tortoises from under ground but then i took a arrow to the knee.
Mine comes from the local water processing and filtration plant, but this varies depending where you are, as yours may be coming straight from a river, dam, etc.; something that you don't want it to be coming from.
The Bible tells us that Christ will return with all His angels at the second coming. You can read this in: Matthew 24:30-31 Matthew 25:31 2 Thess. 1:7-8 Revelation 19:11-14
NO, sperm is only created in the male species. . Yes if she has recently had vaginal intercourse and the male has ejaculated inside her, then sperm can be expelled, and drip from her vagina during orgasm. The act of orgasm can also help push the sperm farther inside her to facilitate the fertilizat…ion of her eggs for pregnancy.. ( Full Answer )
The Christian belief is that Jesus, the Messiah, came once, and He is coming again at the end of the world. Some Jews believe that He has not come yet, and that Jesus was an impostor.
You will need to be prepared. Constant vigilance. And ensure you have some chocolate milk. They hate chocolate milk.
compulsory natural force of attraction between opposite sexual desire is the cause of my arrival.
You are a child of the most high. You have a creator, a father, a friend. He loves you very much. Your journey here is a test to see if you can make it back to him.
You come is the second person present simple conjugation of "come". You have come is the second present perfect conjugation of "come". Singular and plural forms are the same in second person conjugations.
no not all the time but it dose sometimes if your scared just go 2 tha doctor.
Im guessing that your young since you did not know this. The sperm is made in the testicals right underneath the penis. The sperm cells are in a liquid called semen. When a man is having sex, masturbating (when the man uses his hands and rubs up and down his penis until he ejaculates), or stimulated… enough, his penis rises, gets harder and longer, becoming erect. That way, it is easier to slide in and out of the vagina. After doing that, the sperm and semen shoot out of the tip of the penis. The liquid is white. It then travels through the woman and fertalizes her egg. And look up what a penis looks like to find out. But im sure you already know since your asking this question ( Full Answer )
My (remembered) grammar says that the proper wording would beeither "Where do they come from?", or "Where did they come from?".
It depends what you believe in. Some people believe that godcreated us and some believe we came from apes or fish. And somepeople believe god created evolution. Really it depends on what youbelieve in.
Where, indeed? You were born biologically to your parents, but theexact reason as to why we are able to reproduce is not known toscience. It can explain a great deal about the biology and geneticsof human reproduction, but why it should happen in the first placeis and always will be a mystery. My an…swer would be that you wereallowed to be born by God, but as to why any of us are here is oneof life's great mysteries. ( Full Answer )
You are a product of the genetic material supplied 50% from yourfather and 50% from your mother and from the place where you wereborn.
You use 'comes' with the third person singular: he, she or itcomes. For all other forms you use 'come'.