they would play hopskotch and skipping but poor children sometimes got sent to the workhouse
Definitely not because, Rich children thought that the poor were horrible disgusting animals They were not taught that the poor were horrible, disgusting animals, but there was always the risk of disease from the poor..On the plus side many philanthropic institutions were started in the UK during this time, such as The Salvation Army and Dr.Barnados, also many other minor charities and hospitals
they invented disposable diapers :)
The rich wore fancy gowns and suits the poor wore rags and other horrid stuff
By sending food and money to poor children in poor countries
Edwardian.
Poor Victorians typically earned very low wages, often ranging from 10 to 20 shillings per week, which was barely enough to cover basic living expenses. Many families relied on multiple income sources, including women and children working in factories or as domestic servants, to make ends meet. The cost of living during the Victorian era was high, leading to significant hardship for the impoverished. Overall, their earnings reflected the stark economic inequalities of the time.
it wasn't good for poor children in this time dickens. had to get money fo his family
poor children worked wealthy children went to the theatre or played and dabbed on jeff
No, poor children did not go to school during Tudor times. During this time period very children went to school or were educated.
A lump of coal
Definitely not because, Rich children thought that the poor were horrible disgusting animals They were not taught that the poor were horrible, disgusting animals, but there was always the risk of disease from the poor..On the plus side many philanthropic institutions were started in the UK during this time, such as The salvation army and Dr.Barnados, also many other minor charities and hospitals