0
What else can I help you with?
How and where do scientists find evidence of early human life?
Scientists find evidence of early human life through various means, including excavation of archaeological sites, analysis of fossils and artifacts, and dating techniques such as carbon dating. These discoveries are typically found in places where early humans lived, such as caves, rock shelters, and open-air sites. By piecing together these findings, scientists can reconstruct the behaviors, lifestyle, and evolution of early humans.
Where did scientist find evidence about rodinia?
Scientists found evidence in Rodinia in Antartica.
Why do scientists only know a little about early North America?
Scientists don't know much about early North America because the evidence they find must be verified that it was from that time period. Also, most of the knowledge they "know" is in fact inferred by basic knowldege, and artifiacts from the earlier times.
Where did scientists finally find evidence that supported wegeners ideas?
Mid-Ocean Ridge
Why do scientists think that the first people crossed the land bridge?
to find riches
What evidence do scientists find in fossils and living things?
Scientists find evidence in fossils and living things such as changes in morphology, genetic similarities, and transitional forms that support the theory of evolution. Fossils can show physical adaptations over time, and living organisms can reflect common ancestry through shared genetic traits. These pieces of evidence help scientists to understand the evolutionary history and relationships between different species.
Why are forennsic scientists important?
They are important because they take the evidence that was found and they do tests on it and sometimes they can find more evidence, for example: they could find a finger print or they could find fibres that are important to the investigation.
What evidence leads some scientists to believe that there is no global warming or it is not caused by human activity?
There is no evidence proving global warming is not happening. A very tiny number of scientists (usually not climate scientists) try to find evidence but they have found nothing.There is a colossal amount of evidence proving it is happening:Temperature records rising and being broken.Sea levels rising.Ice caps and glaciers melting.Animal, bird and insect habitats changing.More unusual weather and more powerful storms.
Why do you think scientists are trying to find out more about how and were early humans lived?
Because they are scientists
Can plant pollen provide scientists with evidence about future climates?
ur neer gonna find da fucing answer
What tools would you use to find evidence of early human societies in Africa or Asia?
To find evidence of early human societies in Africa or Asia, I would use archaeological tools such as ground-penetrating radar and excavation tools to uncover artifacts and settlement remains. Additionally, I would utilize carbon dating and stratigraphy to analyze the age and context of findings. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) could help in mapping ancient sites and understanding settlement patterns. Lastly, collaboration with anthropologists and historians would provide a broader context for interpreting the evidence.
What will happen if scientist find evidence that contradict the law or a principle?
If scientists find evidence that contradicts a law or principle, it could lead to a revision of the existing law or principle to accommodate the new evidence. Scientists would then conduct further research to better understand the phenomenon and refine our understanding of the natural world. Science is dynamic and open to updating its knowledge based on new evidence.
