moles live anywhere with lots of soil, underground. they don't live in Australia and Antarctica... obviously the latter
A mole of S (32 g) weighs more than a mole of Sodium Na (23 g)
No; 1 mole of molcular oxygen (O2) is 31,998 g and 1 mole of sulfur (S) is 32,06 g.
No; 1 mole of molcular oxygen (O2) is 31,998 g and 1 mole of sulfur (S) is 32,06 g.
the atomic mass of FeS2 is 110. You cannot find the no. of moles in a mole of FeS2 coz it is only a mole.
totally not. b/c a mole is a omnivores and usually eats worms and bugs. if it was living in a habitat with no food of that kind it would probably eat one if it was dead.
No, the (molar) mass (ie. the mass of one mole) is different by factor 2.004:Oxygen atom (O)15.999 g/mole O2,Oxygen molecule (elemental gas, O2) 31.998 g/mole O2Sulfur atom (S) 32.06 g/mole S,Sulfur molecule (bright yellow solid, S8) 256.48 g/mole S8,Sulfur molecule (S2) 64.12 g/mole S2 (there are more than 20 other allotropes)
The tigers habitat is in the safari.
The simplest formula based on the given moles would be BaSO4 (barium sulfate). This is determined by dividing each mole value by the smallest mole value (0.080 mole), resulting in a ratio of 1 Ba : 1 S : 4 O, which corresponds to BaSO4.
The Southern Marsupial Mole is Endangered because when it does venture to the surface it is at great risk of being eaten by: Foxes, Cats and dingos. Also train tracks interfere with there Habitat.
no a mole is a consumer it eats insects not decomposes them
the Atomic Mass of FeS2 is 110. You cannot find the no. of moles in a mole of FeS2 coz it is only a mole.
1.40 kg is equal to 1.40 / 0.03418= 40.96 mole H2S, thus 40.96 mole of S (sulfur) which is 40.96 * 0.03207= 1.31 mole S(0.03418 and 0.03207 are molar masses of H2S and S respectively in kg/mol)