You can determine if you live in a area were earthquakes are likely to occur by going on line and looking for past seismographs in your area.
Washington, Lacey
Yes cells can live without soil. They do need oxygen, nutrients and water to live though.
Unless the earthquakes (Major ones) are always occurring, you get a "not in my time" attitude. Also, the area around some volcanoes is very fertile, more important to farmers than "a little smoke".
People live in Kobe after the earthquake because they believe that the impacts of future earthquakes will be reduced. They think this because they have been introduced to the 'Earthquake Emergency Plan'.
Hamilton could be a safe place but not completely sure
leavong them with out a place to live.
a fully closed house or a vehicle
Keralam is the best place to live in India
d. all of the above is the best answer for you!! hope that helps! ;)
it wouldn't be the best place to live
to alert the people who live in the particular place specially the people who are in the epicenter
not really in some place's as Kansas city Missouri) there is a lot of crime but on the other hand some places in Kansas is a safe and peaceful place to live (such as Lawrence) Kansas is 1 of the safest place to live (no earthquakes but some tornado's)
The borough of Elmbridge in Surrey has just been nominated as the best place to live in the UK.
No!
No.
Don't live in an area prone to earthquakes.