Shield, helmet, breastplate, shinguards.
Roman armor worn by soldiers in ancient times was typically made of metal and could weigh between 40 to 60 pounds.
Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.
Light. Heavy armor might get in the way and weigh you down. Light is much more attractive of course ;). Heavy armor does offer a lot of benefits though.
The Roman Empire collapsed because it was taken over by incoming peoples from Eurasia. They hastened this by admitting large numbers of these migrants. There is a lesson here for today's Europe.
Hernán Cortés, the Spanish conquistador who led the expedition that caused the fall of the Aztec Empire, typically wore armor that consisted of a breastplate, greaves, and a helmet made from steel or iron. This armor was designed to provide protection in battle while allowing for some mobility. The style was influenced by European armoring techniques of the early 16th century, featuring elements like chainmail and plate armor. However, it was often heavy and cumbersome, which could hinder movement during combat.
Hoplomachi (greek style: spear, helmet, heavy armor) and mirmillones (roman style, gladius (50cm), large square shield, helmet and heavy armor) were the most successful gladiator types. Both were heavily armored. In latest times, the retiarii (light armor, helmet, trident and fishnet) were very difficult opponents to any type, because of the new and unusual fighting style and their weaponry. I would say either mirmillones or thraces (similar to mirmillones, heavy armor, curved blade and large, round shield) had the most victories because of their fighting style was relatively hard to counter, and they were well defended. Offensive types such as dimachaeri (light armor, double sword), essendari (heavy footmen with axe or other heavy weapon) and velites (light armor + spears) were very entertaining to watch (i suppose :D) but they fell quickly in the battle without armor.
No - Light armor is leather, cloth, etc. Plate armor is considered heavy armor.
Yes, heavy taxes significantly contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire. As the empire expanded, the financial burden on its citizens increased, leading to widespread discontent and economic strain. This taxation was often perceived as oppressive, causing social unrest and undermining loyalty to the state. Ultimately, these factors weakened the empire's stability and capacity to respond to external threats.
The Greeks wanted to break away from the Roman Empire because they desired independence and autonomy. The Romans imposed their language, culture, and political system on the Greeks, which led to resistance and a longing for self-rule. Additionally, the Greeks resented the heavy taxes and exploitation imposed by the Roman administration.
150-200 pounds
Although most people seem to think advancements in armor and weapons decides the fate of battle, the outcome is actually more reliant on training. The spartan warrior was submerged in the battle mentality from the age of seven and wore little armor because it would negate the warriors agiliy. Knights generally wore heavy armor and long swords for more intense combat. The Spartan training and mindset would likely prove superior to the heavy armor and horseback charges of the Knights.
Cobateuring World War 1 which of the following helped to compensate for heavy Combat losses of officers